Milkypops wrote: » hey chops, just wondering would u be able to tel me what came up in the oct 11 and oct 12 tort sitting....im planning on leaving occupiers liability and passing off out as they came up in last sitting.....good or bad idea? cheers for any input
chops018 wrote: » I think I ask this every sitting but it's ok to underling and highlight yes? Just no writing?
Happychicky7 wrote: » That's what I've done for company/EU legislation in the past and its been fine.
Lawstudent007 wrote: » And you covering everything for contract? It Is there any chapters you're specifically focussing on?
Morris_fe1s wrote: » My motto is cover everything but thats just me, and its always worked, but it might not for you.
sophya wrote: » Maybe add in citizenship and anti-discrimination, can be useful for FM of persons. And a bit more on competition would give you peace of mind e.g. state aids.
Milkypops wrote: » just wondering will these topics get me 5 questions in company... corporate personality corporate authority ultra vires directors duties restriction/disqualification shareholder/directors meetings share transfer shareholder protection/remedies corporate borrowings retention of title liquidation receivership art 80 disposition of assets cheers
Robbo wrote: » I'd throw in examinership as well, unless it was on the last paper in which cases the odds dictate leaving it out. It's a handy enough topic if you're on top of things. Useful recent cases would include Xtravision, B&Q and John Hinde with the emphasis on breaking leases to make branches more viable. Also, to keep it fresh, it might be worth mentioning the Peat's World of Electronics examinership (only newspaper reports available I think) where there was a liquidation in train, then an examinership and now they're in liquidation again. I believe the owners of the company feel they were "bounced" into the examinership so there might be a duty of care angle there.
chops018 wrote: » I'm doing pretty much the same as you bar one or two. Also I know the main one's better than others. Steering away from examinership too tbh, don't know if it's a good idea or not. A couple of them I'm just noting the legislation incase I get stuck and need a question, capital maintenance being one of them.
Milkypops wrote: » ya exactly i was wondering about capital maintenance and say ill do the same... did u see the march exam paper? i know the topics that came up but was it an easy paper, in other words will the october one be a bitch to sit? im just hoping corporate authority, corporate personality, directors duties and charges/rot clauses come up and well surely get another question from the topics we've done. also has there been any landmark cases recently for the main topics....bar automatic crystalisation? Im really just sticking to the usual cases, its too late to try and start learning new ones off now in my opinion.
sally01 wrote: » Covering the following for property, will it be enough? Finding/treasure troveLandlord and Tenant Co-ownership Family Property Adverse possession Licences and estoppel EasementsSuccession Thanks
Stormington wrote: » Bear in mind that Succession is 2 questions. I've got the same as you but I have got Covenants instead of Landlord & Tenant. That, Land registration and Mortgages were too messy for me.
Fe1exams wrote: » Do people think its really necessary to bring the legislation into the contract law exam?
May92 wrote: » Hi, i've covered most of the equity side of the equity and trusts course but havn't looked at any of the trusts side, could anyone tell me a few of the must-cover topics for trusts please?
