Sunglasses Ron wrote: » And let me guess, some obsure Japanese rice brewed lager would go down a storm with the chin strokers, but because Bud is big, it's ****e.
Seaneh wrote: » . Read the ingredients list for both. Budvar doesn't have ****ing rice in it. .
Sunglasses Ron wrote: » If Bud was presented with a description of being brewed in an overtly traditional non factory way since the dark ages do you doubt it would not be critically lauded?.
Sunggripes Ron wrote: » My ****ing arse. If you served Budweiser to a beer snob out of an unmarked tap in a craft bar and told him on the menu it was a smooth, crisp beer brewed since 1892 in a Slovak monastery, the dopey hipster prick would be raving about it whilst simultaneously badmouthing Bud as commercial crap. I remember n article a while back when they gave critics Tesco branded wine and gave them another Tesco wine but with a fake label the critics slated the branded wine and raved about the unmarked Tesco wine.
Sunglasses Ron wrote: » Well that's odd because the first time I had a Budvar was in Prague. The odd thing about Prague is that despite being apparently the European centre of beer, apart from Budvar most bars only have about two or three other beers on tap, the place gets pretty repetitive. Great ciy for a lads session but **** you get pretty bored of drinking Pilsner Urquell (??) and Gambrinus (?) for a week straight.
Sunglasses Ron wrote: » Of course they would. Budvar is a highly regarded Czech beer. Bud is regarded as yank toilet water. Apart from the fact Budvar has slightly more of a kick to the taste due to its slightly higher alcohol volume Budweiser and Budvar taste nearly identical. Try telling that to a beer snob. You'd have more chance of getting blowjob off the pope.
dan1895 wrote: » Whatever about the tesco wine but that is complete bull. Your basically saying Bud tastes like craft beer?? Get real.
Sunglasses Ron wrote: » Because the lad who quoted me seemed to think I had sank ten pints of Bud before trying a Budvar and thinking it was the same. Budvar and Budweiser are like Opel and Vauxhall, and no amount of pretentious hipster **** will convince anyone smart enough otherwise.
MYOB wrote: » I have no idea what the relevance of where you first had it was. .
Sunglasses Ron wrote: » Well that's odd because the first time I had a Budvar was in Prague. The odd thing about Prague is that despite being apparently the European centre of beer, apart from Budvar most bars only have about two or three other beers on tap, the place gets pretty repetitive.
MYOB wrote: » After about ten other beers, someone might get confused. If you think those two taste the same otherwise, you need to get your tongue examined, urgently. The fact that they're not even made of the same ingredients might be a very obvious indicator.
Sunglasses Ron wrote: » My ****ing arse. If you served Budweiser to a beer snob out of an unmarked tap in a craft bar and told him on the menu it was a smooth, crisp beer brewed since 1892 in a Slovak monastery, the dopey hipster prick would be raving about it whilst simultaneously badmouthing Bud as commercial crap. I remember n article a while back when they gave critics Tesco branded wine and gave them another Tesco wine but with a fake label the critics slated the branded wine and raved about the unmarked Tesco wine.
Seaneh wrote: » No, they wouldn't. So stop talking ****ing nonsense.
Sunglasses Ron wrote: » My ****ing arse. If you served Budweiser to a beer snob out of an unmarked tap in a craft bar and told him on the menu it was a smooth, crisp beer brewed since 1892 in a Slovak monastery, the dopey hipster prick would be raving about it whilst simultaneously badmouthing Bud as commercial crap.
johnnyskeleton wrote: » . If Irish people want to pay €5-6 for a pint of heinkien when they can get a pint of an interesting and better made ale for €3-4, then it's their fault we get ripped off
dd972 wrote: » Imagine what a Wetherspoons on Eden Quay or Talbot St would be like! I'm sure such a company does their homework on catchment areas and clientele though.
Ruubot2 wrote: » How does Southern Ireland or Eire work for you then? Fussy!
diomed wrote: » ROI? We didn't all cram into the GPO to be called ROI.
ScumLord wrote: » I've never seen a £2 breakfast, unless it's basically just a sausage samwidge. I've had the breakfast in witherspoons and it's certainly not the worst. I had a read of their own magazine at the time. They claim they buy direct from farms, with the size of them I'd believe it. Witherspoons have buying power and that would allow them to offer meals quite cheaply. I'm not saying it's great food but for the price of a mcdonalds meal you can get something pretty decent and fairly healthy in witherspoons.
murpho999 wrote: » A Weatherspoon's breakfast composed of many parts and being cooked by staff must be composed of cheap and low quality food to be sold for £2.
0ph0rce0 wrote: » For the same reason i never will never eat the shíte that comes out of lidl or aldi