PrettyBoy wrote: » Just heard on the radio that the 5S is "expected to cost €800 out of contract"? Will there be a 16GB 5S?
DubDJ wrote: » That'll be the 32GB model. It should start at around 16GB for €699.
whiterebel wrote: » You are asked whether you wish to share the information with the developer or Apple, and you can opt out. I don't recall this being asked on the android devices.
.ak wrote: » I thought the 5C was going to be released to rival Samsung's midrange phones. It's just another expensive phone. Think they're missing a trick by not releasing a 'Nano' style phone tbh.
whiterebel wrote: » I was shocked when I was trying to fix something on my son's Android phone when I saw the privileges most, if not all, apps were demanding.
krudler wrote: » I don't see the point of the 5C at all tbh, they have the 4s as a "budget" phone, the 5 is still plenty good and the 5s is a new hat version of the 5. An "entry" iphone shouldnt cost more than most high end androids
FutureGuy wrote: » Just got a new cover for my iPhone 5. That'll do me for 12 months.
Creamy Goodness wrote: » it's not an entry phone though? it's a replacement to the 5. People need to stop thinking of the C meaning 'Cheap' or budget, it's anything but. It's a powerful phone.
kjl wrote: » Where I work I have to do a trip report at the end of the week to show my manager what I have been up to. When I have had a bit of a lazy week I will write a report and waffle it out a bit so it seems like I have done loads of work. This entire keynote felt like one of those reports. They haven't done anything new, every innovation in iOS7 came from the jailbreak community. I used to be a bit apple supporter, went to android last year and am never coming back.
new_maniac wrote: » I do hate the lack of innovation myself, I actually heard this morning that one news report was entitled 'is this the end of the password?'.....fingerprint readers have been around for over a decade, and it's only when Apple does it that anyone pays attention - they didn't even invent
Inquitus wrote: » The iPhone 5C is an utterly hideous looking device, if it was cheap, maybe people could live with it, but its not much of a leap up to the 5S. I like the 5S in the new colours, it looks very well, the 5C seems to be utterly pointless, looks like shít, costs almost the same.
L5 wrote: » Yes they've been around for over a decade. I had one on a dell xps I bought 5 years ago, and you know what , it was a piece of crap that was ridiculously hard to use. You had to slowly slide your finger across it. It worked maybe 3 times out of 10. The way apple has implemented it, it just works . Simple as that. Hold your finger on it for less than 1 second and that's it.
new_maniac wrote: » Oh yeah, i'm not questioning the quality of what they've produced, anything apple have produced is of a very high standard....it's just how everyone chooses to ignore ten years of technology when Apple do something. Lol, I had a laptop with the same thing actually, I did give up and revert to using the password login
Bullseye1 wrote: » What is the price of the sim free iPhone 5C? Is it true it's between €80-100 cheaper than the regular iPhone? Hardly cheap. So much for apple claiming he metal casing being the expenive production cost.
Mr.S wrote: » The iPhone 5C is €599 and €699 while the 5S is €699 & €799. For 16/32gb models. No date for Ireland, probably December. No carrier prices yet.
Mr.S wrote: » Its the European € price for both phones direct from Apple, which is what the Irish site will be charging when they take preorders! Alternatively, the UK store (belfast) will be selling 'em from about €560 depending on the exchange rate you get on the day!
guil wrote: » My point still stands. There was a difference in price of the 4s between those 2 stores and the Irish store. Look up the thread.
whiterebel wrote: » Higher VAT rate in France and Germany, wasn't it?
miralize wrote: » Carphone Warehouse employee said email came through which stated they’re getting 5s on the 20th of this month apparently. I said that was for the UK, and the guy replied that what he has heard was the above..
mad muffin wrote: » I've read this and re-read it. I still don't understand what this means.