Sarz91 wrote: » Dunno if anyone else has seen this but it looks like a good idea. Phone Bloks
Serephucus wrote: » Linus has got a giveaway going for 8x4TB WD Reds. Go look:http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/52951-wd-red-4tb-giveaway/
ED E wrote: » Need to pick up a netbook. Laptop is f'cked and I need something for college. Ultrabook would rock, but no way do I have the cash so its down to something for €300-400. Are there any decent netbooks left? Market seems to have been decimated by tablet mania.
Gehad_JoyRider wrote: » well we no that, its says it on the website.. Look at all the games optimized to invidia because of phzsex... I've played them Being honest its a let down on a amd rig I always get jutterey play Boarder lands 2 perfect example I play tomb raider on my rig on ultra high settings and its beautiful So why wouldn't one of the biggest games of all time IMO be set to drop with new cards it makes perfect sense make money, name of the game and for years I've always got the impression that uneducated people think AMD are **** when its not the case. Im delighted that bf3 is on AMD its just give the invidia/intel folk a kick in the nuts.
game4it70 wrote: » AMD are releasing new cards around the same time as Bf4 comes out. To me it looks like EA/Dice are in bed with AMD and are really trying to push the "3gb" to make people lean towards getting a card from AMD as 3gb is more common with them compared to Nvidia. They also said at E3 that Bf4 will run better on AMD systems.
Gehad_JoyRider wrote: » could it be a leak to possibility of a new gpu to be released?
the_syco wrote: » Had a look, and off topic, found a video with "ultra high 1080p on hd 7870 3gb with fx injector", yet they upload with it 480p...! But couldn't find any 3GB 7870's for sale.
game4it70 wrote: » How can they say a 7870 is recommended with 3gb vram when there aren't any 3gb 7870's (i think)?
Gehad_JoyRider wrote: » Hows every one feeling about BF4 settings ?
tuxy wrote: » I know this but the recommended specs are still 3gb this could deter many from buying nvidia cards regardless of performance.
raymix wrote: » 3GB would be required for bragging rights, not actual experience. The only thing using so much memory would be HD textures, and I still kinda doubt they will manage to use all that amount.
tuxy wrote: » It looks like owners of some of Nvidias higher end cards(gtx 680/770) will not meet the recommended graphics memory.