Stojkovic wrote: » The Seven Years War was really the first World War.
mattjack wrote: » One of my uncles died in a concentration camp. He was drunk and fell out of his watchtower one night.
MRnotlob606 wrote: » i have a world war 1 belt buckle
Wibbs wrote: » Cool. I have a Great war wristwatch(where it first became popular. Before that pocket watches were for men, wristwatches for women). Still ticks along mightily too. Just finished a book on the Somme this very day. Jesus christ, even though I had a fair notion, the carnage and daily death toll was still utterly startling to me. Unimaginable really. Many thousands could be mown down in a single day in a remarkably tiny area. Many moons ago I was in that part of France and it's worth a visit to see the graveyards of many nations, row after row. Mechanised death by Maxim guns, though artillery killed the most as an average. I agree with others that WW2 seems more relevant to us because it looks more "modern" in many ways. Movies and TV and media adds to this by making way more documentaries and dramas about WW2. It's more "photogenic" for a start. WW1 feels more like a 19th century war, which in many ways it was. WW2 was the 20th century war. Even the way many wars are fought today had it's genesis in WW2. Look at the gulf wars. The US used the German innovation of Blitzkrieg in all but name.
dj jarvis wrote: » unless you are aged about 70 , you should change that to great uncle !!
strangel00p wrote: » Errr...hang on, I'm 38 and three of my uncles were in the second world war...
GonzalezT1000 wrote: » World War 1 was a very interesting war but it's not discussed nearly as much as World War 2. Does World War 1 interest you?
CruelCoin wrote: » Not particularly. The entire thing was waged as a method of willy-waving and Honerz whoring. If i happen upon it on the history channel i watch it, but i don't seek it out.
clairefontaine wrote: » I think it's because the US was more involved in WW2 and very much part of our heroic narrative. So as a major producer and disseminator of media, film, stories, narratives, etc, more attention gets put out there about ww2. Also ww2 was the beginning of intelligence for the US, CIA etc, and the glamour of espionage stories around MI5 etc, have a glamour that keeps people very intrigues. So dare I say there is a glamor attached to ww2. The women fighter pilots, the music, Casablanca, etc. Also, Nazi iconography was powerful so sticks more so and is memorable in a way ww1 isn't. I was really shocked and moved and horrified the more I read about ww1 because I had no idea how horrific I was. WW1 doesn't get as much representation.
Deleted User wrote: » The war memorial gardens near Phoenix Park in Dublin say that something like 49,000 Irish people died during World War 1? That's a crazy amount for it not to be remembered or any memorials!
dxhound2005 wrote: » I think it was a good war but it wasn't a Great War.
IvySlayer wrote: » WWI is extremely complicated to explain how it really started
wretcheddomain wrote: » Ehm...no, it isn't.
losthorizon wrote: » Indeed Michael Palins doc has it that the German soldiers were trying to wave back the American soldiers as they didnt want to shoot as they knew about the ceasefire but the American commanders just wanted to gain ground by fighting which they were going to get anyway. Madness