Top prof tells the banks, 'I'll blame you for suicides' Psychiatrist targets lenders on behalf of patients feeling strain over increased financial pressureshttp://www.independent.ie/irish-news/top-prof-tells-the-banks-ill-blame-you-for-suicides-29418331.html
Considering the population as a whole, Ireland has the sixth lowest rate of death by suicide in the EU, compared with the lowest rate of 3.9 in Greece and the highest of 34.0 in Lithuania.http://www.thejournal.ie/suicide-rates-1070842-Sep2013/
Tigger wrote: » Suicide is very under reported in ireland a lot of suicides by crashing a car are reported as accidental death. That's why our rate seems low. People don't kill the selves because of a letter from the bank and banks should t be held responsible for someone killing the self due to having been sent a letter. It's all a media circus at the moment .
Tigger wrote: » Suicide is very under reported in ireland a lot of suicides by crashing a car are reported as accidental death. That's why our rate seems low.
Dr Ivor Browne says he has been seeking out the names of bank staff responsible for the pressure his patients are under before issuing them with the formal notice ... "I am writing letters to the banks holding them personally responsible if this man commits suicide."
mikemac1 wrote: » And that accident can be someone falling asleep at the wheel. Lots of shift workers in Ireland It's not called suicide as there is zero proof it was and speculation can be hurtful. Driving while tired can be as dangerous as driving drunk
Skid X wrote: » That is a grossly irresponsible action for a medical professional to undertake. Regardless of the rights and wrongs of their actions bank employees are only doing their job. Writing this letters is more likely to make bank customers who are in trouble take their own life. And bank employees are people too - imagine receiving a letter like this when you might be under huge stress yourself?
Tigger wrote: » If you don't want to believe that's your prerogative but I have more than speculation.
theGEM wrote: » That's what I have heard, doctors and the corroners court will do everything to avoid naming suicide as the cause of death for the families sake. Perhaps it's the same in Greece - never belive statistics.
Knob Longman wrote: » Swept under the carpet in traditional Irish style as if it doesn't exist..
donegal__road wrote: » at least they have decent weather in Greece.. I think that the suicide rate increased here since the start of the recession,you didnt happen to see this today btw
weldoninhio wrote: » A bank keeping a customer informed of arrears owed!! The humanity!!!
theGEM wrote: » Just reading about the Priory Hall case today and how the banks are causing stress and people to take their own lives etc. But then I see Greece has the lowest suicide rate in the EU and their economy is worse than ours. I wonder what we're doing wrong in this country. Is it easy to blame the recession and the banks when the real problem is something else. Something that be fixed now. Any thoughts??http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2009/12/09/business/economy/suicideratesoecd.jpg
NiallSparky wrote: » You don't think it's got anything to do with the fact that reporting on suicide is proven to lead to an increased suicide rate?
Nodin wrote: » A woman made a widow due to that very debt, on a property they have to pay for but can't live in.....yes, the humanity. Or lack of it.
Sleepy wrote: » I think there's a post-colonial aversion to taking responsibility for your own actions in this country. If modern republicans are anything to judge those of the past by (and in the past, they would have been a majority rather than a fringe group), every problem could be considered to have been caused by "de Brits". Flash forward to our own time and you can pretty much substitute the banks and politicians for the British. Many homeowners don't want to admit that they played a large part in the creation of their own problems: whether that was exaggerating their earnings on their mortgage application, a failure to realise that their earning capacity could decrease (particularly if they were giving up educational opportunities to avail of those earnings), or simply were silly enough to agree with bubble-level property prices. Of course the banks irresponsible lending practices and government of the day's encouraging of the bubble and failure to regulate played major parts in our current problems, but it still takes two people to sign a mortgage agreement. Even outside of the property market, you can see similar behaviour throughout Irish society: the "it's not my fault I'm fat, it's genetic / my (self diagnosed) overactive thyroid / just big bones" brigade; the legal system that regards intoxication as a mitigating rather than contributory factor to a crime; the women that regard violent or abusive outbursts as being excusable because it's "their time of the month"; the men who abandon their offspring because "she said she was on the pill / wouldn't go to England / she's a bitch" etc. Choices have consequences and we need to teach our future generations to accept those consequences and not to feel too ashamed to simply admit to a failing and admit "mea culpa".
weldoninhio wrote: » Oh i must have missed the part where the bank forced the mortgage onto her and killed her husband.
Jernal wrote: » There's another side to this though. Many banks are essentially bullying when it comes to debt collecting. Bullying, no matter what form it takes, is psychologically toxic to a person's mental health. Then if you have somebody who's already vulnerable and expose them to bully you've got a very high risk situation.
Nodin wrote: » .....are you being purposely obtuse? She took out a mortgage on a property that - unbeknownst to her - was unsafe to live in.
weldoninhio wrote: » OK, so why should the bank lose out on the money they loaned her in good faith??
Podge_IRL wrote: Which, as harsh as it is, is not their problem. She is the one who signed the lease for the place, the bank just provided funding.
Skid X wrote: » I wouldn't try to condone certain actions by the banks. Some of their procedures and policies are out of order, and are putting severe stress on customers. But this is not the way to regulate the bankers' activities. Imagine having poor mental health, receiving one of those letters and then getting the news that one of your customers had killed themselves? It could lead to a cycle of suicide.
Nodin wrote: » ......because the loan was taken on the basis of buying a property, which was sold under false pretences. Why should an individual who has been effectively conned have to continue to pay a bank for a worthless item they unknowingly bought?
.....which is the kind of "I'm allright jack" nonsense that led to a lot of our problems in the first place.
Podge_irl wrote: » Because the bank didn't sell the property. Her problem is with the developer..
Podge_irl wrote: » No, complete abdication of personal responsibility is what led to a lot of our problems. The onus is on the person buying the property to ensure that it is up to standard, not the bank.
Nodin wrote: » ......because the loan was taken on the basis of buying a property, which was sold under false pretences. Why should an individual who has been effectively conned have to continue to pay a bank for a worthless item they unknowingly bought? .....which is the kind of "I'm allright jack" nonsense that led to a lot of our problems in the first place.