chakademus wrote: » he is jarred.
Mint Sauce wrote: » At least they tell it like it is. Would never hear ITV or the Beeb talking about their National Side that honestly.
chakademus wrote: » I appreciate your point but I think I would prefer a more "objective" viewpoint the analysts. I used to love that Dunphy volatility with support from the Jiles rock of sense with poor Brady bouncin around between them.. but now it just seems depressing.
Jake1 wrote: » its not like hes in the Dail bar, then voting on anything important , its part of the Dunphy magic .
BillyMitchel wrote: » Your thread is a disgrace.
Wabbit Ears wrote: » Fcuk off to the football forum.
Vito Corleone wrote: » Well Bill, we have to take the thread on its merits.
BillyMitchel wrote: » Thread has no merits!
chakademus wrote: » Chill. Any ways my post was not regarding soccer per say but whether RTE question the fact that someone they pay good money to might be under the influence whilst doing his job. Again I add, this may not be the case.
Howard Juneau wrote: » Any evidence to back up your accusation?
chakademus wrote: » People seem to be pretty sensitive about the mere question of Dunphy being sober or not, some even justify it as being part of the entertainment. If you don't mind me saying I think a thread discussing the appropriateness of a sports analyst being under the influence on live national television absolutely DOES have merits.
chakademus wrote: » My accusation? Read my OP.