Mod Post: A reminder to folks that trying to bait supporters by posting alternate names for a football club may lead to a yellow card. Folk are welcome to post in any superthread they wish to, but nobody is free to use superthreads or this forum in general as somewhere to try and bait/flame/troll other posters.
Lennonist wrote: » No-one would accuse ye of that - operating within "the spirit of the game" I mean. The transfer window slammed shut in Scotland last night two days before it closes in England and most other places around Europe. There are those saying that the window closed early because the SFA made an admin error when handing out a transfer ban to The The Rangers and the window closed early in order to make the embargo effective. Was wondering what your thoughts were on that?
Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: » The only club it really harmed was your own the SFA are incompetent. UEFA recommended to them to keep it open but they chose to go their own way.
Lennonist wrote: » I know that, but that is the reason why the window shut early.
Eirebear wrote: » Well, if you're taking the line that they deliberately harmed Celtic in order to hurt Rangers, then I'd be pretty pissed off if i were you. The men in charge of our game are a complete and utter joke, and although you guys know that, many of you have willfully ignored it for a couple of years because of the Rangers situation. That'll come back to haunt us all.
Jelle1880 wrote: » http://www.scribd.com/doc/164607084/5-Way-Agreement-As-issued-to-all-parties-for-signature Talk about being shafted
bobmalooka wrote: » Can't read it on mobile, what's the deal?
8.1 Neither RFC nor Sevco may make any disclosure to a third party, press release or public announcement whatsoever about, concerning or relating to this Agreement and/or the transactions contemplated by it or disclose any of the terms of this Agreement except interms which do not depart from the terms of a public statement agreed in writing by theparties or with the express prior written consent of all parties to this Agreement.
Jelle1880 wrote: » The main issues are:1. The transfer embargo. It's still clearly obvious that it's illegal, yet Rangers were forced to accept it. 2. Rangers were forced to pay the legal costs, against the ruling of a judge. 3. Rangers were forced to stay silent on the contents of this agreement. Those are just the 3 worst points for me, tons of other stuff in there that wouldn't hold up in any court.
Jelle1880 wrote: » The main issues are: 1. The transfer embargo. It's still clearly obvious that it's illegal, yet Rangers were forced to accept it. 2. Rangers were forced to pay the legal costs, against the ruling of a judge. 3. Rangers were forced to stay silent on the contents of this agreement. Those are just the 3 worst points for me, tons of other stuff in there that wouldn't hold up in any court.
A Dub in Glasgo wrote: » Rangers signed because they wanted to be make money , they were not forced as they had a choice. The signing choice might not to be their/your liking but that does not mean it was forced
Jelle1880 wrote: » Erm, either sign it or no football next season ? Some choice that is. Green tried to spin it back then (for example getting rid of the stripping of trophies) as a victory, but this shows just how far they bent over to the SFA.
Further to the announcement on 4 September 2013, the Company confirms that whilst the Board's discussions have continued with representatives of the group who requisitioned (together the "Requisitioners") a general meeting to consider the proposed resolutions ("Requisition") detailed in the announcement on 2 August 2013 ("General Meeting"), the Board is disappointed to announce that no agreement has been reached. Unless an agreement can be reached prior to 13 September 2013, as set out in the announcement on 2 September 2013, the Company will be required to send a notice to shareholders to convene the General Meeting by no later than 13 September 2013.
Jelle1880 wrote: » From the London Stock Exchange: So basically if it stays the same an EGM can be called by this Friday.
weldoninhio wrote: » Ian Black gets 3 match ban, another 7 games suspended and E7500 for breaching the rules 160 times including betting against his own team 3 times, betting on his team 10 times and another 147 occasions. Scottish football is a joke. A 1 game ban for every time you bet against the team you play for.
