GorillaRising wrote: » No network is stupid enough not to sell something as popular as a new iPhone will no doubt be.
Bluefoam wrote: » Actually, on the contrary, I believe that the two biggest networks in the world have refused to sell the iPhone due to the demands placed on them by Apple, the high marketing costs, the subsidies and the closed ecosystem and restrictive contracts policy applied to these phones.
Pm1e wrote: » Yes, my points exactly. Therefore it is not nonsense to assume there may already be word on who has it outside of assumptions.
ozmo wrote: » IPhone 5C Cases for sale already??http://e.dx.com/collection/201308/iphone-5c/default.html?utm_source=dx&utm_medium=edm&utm_campaign=20130829iphone5caccessories
pfurey101 wrote: » Most of the rumours wot I read say the 5S and cheapo 5C in September, but the odd report from some established news sites still say the big screened 6 is coming in September. Most other rumours wot I read say the 6 is early 2014. I want the bigger screen (not just longer as in the 5) and like millions of other my 4S 2 year contract is up next month, I dont want the 5S with the rumoured big screened 6 looming next year!
pfurey101 wrote: » Most of the rumours wot I read say the 5S and cheapo 5C in September, but the odd report from some established news sites still say the big screened 6 is coming in September. Most other rumours wot I read say the 6 is early 2014. I want the bigger screen (not just longer as in the 5) and like millions of other my 4S 2 year contract is up next month, I dont want the 5S with the rumoured big screened 6 looming next year! Apple know that the millions of apple minions will upgrade in Sep - even if it is "only" a 5S!
Sonics2k wrote: » Not a chance will they make the iPhone 6 a massive device. They may push it to a 4.3" someday, but not this year.
pfurey101 wrote: » Why not even S4 size?
Kagawa wrote: » Hey, does anyone else want a bigger screen for the 5s? I still think that the screen is too small, it should be 4.7 inch IMO
banquo wrote: » The S3 S4 are that size purely because Samsung couldn't get the horsepower they needed for a dreadfully inefficient OS into a device any smaller.
Alpha Dog 1 wrote: » No, there that size because people want them that size otherwise they would not be selling. There screens are fantastic. Watch a video on a 5" screen with 440 ppi then go back to the little 4" screen with 320 ppi and see which one you prefer while also keeping 200 euro in your pocket.
guil wrote: » What new phone with a 5" screen is 200 cheaper than the iPhone 5?
Sonics2k wrote: » I'm sorry, but that's just complete nonsense. Android has nothing to do with the size of the phone, after all, the ATIV S is the same size as the S3. Most Android OEM's prefer to make larger screens because that's their niche in the market, unlike Apple who prefer to make smaller screens on phones. It's highly unlikely they'd ever go beyond 4.3" on a phone, especially after Steve Jobs declared that 3.5" was the ideal size for a screen.
banquo wrote: » Apologies, I should clarify. Android isn't madly inefficient at all. It's the extra overlays, graphics and tweaks that are added to Android by the manufacturer.
