Smithwicks Man wrote: » A lot of people I've talked to about this couldn't care less about a stranger being hit on a night out for example, and possibly ending up with a broken nose or whatever. Yet if a stray dog was laced a kick or had something thrown at it there'd be uproar among many of them and some would nearly physically assault the aggressor. It's a strange one!
Smithwicks Man wrote: » ... whereas I honestly wouldn't bat an eye at humans being attacked or beaten up, provided they weren't elderly or children...
Nailz wrote: » But in situations were the human or dog (or whatever) is a stranger to me; seeing a dog get kicked makes my blood boil a hell of a lot more than it would if it had been a human.
realies wrote: » At the moment the poll shows more people are more angry with the abuse of animals than humans, don't get that at all.
meoklmrk91 wrote: » Anyone who is capable of being abusive to an animal is perfectly capable of being abusive towards a child or any other human. They, by being abusive to an animal, show a complete and utter disregard to the feelings and sensibilities of another living creature, one that depends on humans for its survival. There is a reason that many serial killers first start out with animals.
kfk wrote: » Why?
realies wrote: » My personal opinion is that abuse, neglect or mistreatment of babies and children is the absolute pinnacle of evil, sadistic, revolting behavior, because of the complete helplessness and dependency of the victim, closely followed by the elderly, cruelty/abuse to animals would come after that, for much the same reason.
Smithwicks Man wrote: » Is it just me or is the physical abuse of animals much more frowned upon than the physical abuse of humans? Personally, physical abuse of animals, dogs in particular, boils my blood whereas I honestly wouldn't bat an eye at humans being attacked or beaten up, provided they weren't elderly or children. Maybe it's because they're more helpless than people and can't speak out. What does AH think? Which angers you more/if at all?
seamus wrote: » This. Callously causing suffering to an animal (or a child) requires a extra level of vicious cruelty. Attacking an adult, you can rationalise it to yourself, tell yourself they're not that innocent, etc. I lump cruelty towards animals and children broadly into the same category because they share the same basic issue - it's causing deliberate harm and pain to another being which is functionally incapable of understanding what's occurring or dealing with the fear and anger that may accompany it. You only need to be a bastard to attack another adult, but you need to be a proper evil ****er to attack a child or an animal.
Roose wrote: » There's an honesty and purity in animals that people sympathise with. I'd rather get a kick in the hole than someone doing it to my dog. Probably because I feel I could come to terms with it better, whereas my dog would be scared and confused.
Corvus Maximus wrote: » I agree with you wholeheartedly on that. But RE: kicking your dog? My German Shepherds would just love it, if some knacker tried to kick them.
Whispered wrote: » My dogs, would feel the same fear and confusion as a traditionally "soft" breed like a small fluffy. It's the whole idea of the victim having absolutely no way of defending themselves or getting out of the situation that bothers me when it comes to child and animal abuse.
justforlaugh wrote: » Hate abuse of animals, old people, children and women. men... not too bothered
meoklmrk91 wrote: » It is my own personal belief that anyone who abuses a dependant, be they animal, child, elderly person or disabled, should be dealt with in a very serious manner indeed.