tuxy wrote: » Don't you mean source engine?
NTMK wrote: » It looks like TitanFall is another game that wont be running at 1080p60. Respawn gave the we'll see answer along with saying tat 60fps is more important than res. which is weird imo cause the game looks like its running on a jumped up COD engine
BloodBath wrote: » A €70 mouse doesn't already come with these and replacements? :rolleyes:
glynf wrote: » No, its on the list. Got a set of hyperglide skates for my Deathadder though-well worth €7, feels like a new mouse.
deceit wrote: » My left handed naga arrived today . Anyone else order one?
Nolars wrote: » Everybody was moaning in this gen that consoles are so far behind, now Sony and Microsoft saying this next gen will last another 8/10 years. So my question is Comparing last gen and next gen. Will the Xbox one and ps4 be outdated faster and lagging further behind then the 360 and ps3 was?
BloodBath wrote: » Yes imo. The 360 and ps4 were ahead of most high end pc's at release specs wise. Both companies lost a fortune at release with MS losing around $150 per console and Sony losing a whopping $300+ per unit with high blu-ray and cell costs. The ps4 and xbox-1 are around mid spec at best. I'd say they aren't losing any money per unit this time around either.
BloodBath wrote: » PS4 already lagging behind mid range pc's. Considering the fact dev's have been coming forward saying their PS4 builds of games have been running better than their Xbox-one builds this is a bad sign for next gen consoles.http://ie.ign.com/articles/2013/08/23/gamescom-battlefield-4s-graphics-lacking-on-ps4
marko93 wrote: » Bought Corsair Vengeance PRO RAM only to find it doesn't work with my CPU... Now to email and see if they'll help!
game4it70 wrote: » I'd say you will be fine since it would hang and not get to bios where it tends to run at the full voltage. Have you not got a clear cmos button on the i/o panel you could have used?
Gumbi wrote: » For the love of God people, anyone overclocking Haswell DO NOT USE THE CLASSIC SETUP. Use the shiny new BIOS. Reason being - I accidentally set 1.79vcore and 1.29 VRIN instead of the other way around, and there was no indication to show danger etc. It took me 5 mins to boot into the BIOS (being extremely unstable it would hang on bootup, wouldn't POST or anything). My board doesn'thave a second BIOS, I'm lucky I even got in there. I don't think I've damaged the chip, does anyone have any thoughts in this regard? I haven't tried my refined overclocks yet and settled on 1.29 for 4.5 (I'm actually sable at 1.25, or at least I was before this). I will have another look tomorrow.