8-10 wrote: » Not strictly true that the 16 since were all converted. I remember Michael Owen missing against Chelsea in 2003 in the league at Anfield. Put it wide when we were 1-0 down. For some reason the ref said that Cudicini was off his line and allowed a re-take though!
K-9 wrote: » Maybe if people showed a bit of discretion in what they post up, some of the stuff posted is about as reliable as a goal.com piece. I wouldn't take a quote from here and post it on twitter so I don't see the need to do the reverse, particularly if it's some 17 year old wannabe. It's hard enough to tell what journalists are reasonably reliable without twitter garbage. There must be dozens of posts per minute on twitter about Willian, I don't see why that one is more quotable than most others.
GTR63 wrote: » But I thought we are buying Eriksen, its been reported we're signing him so much I assume we are buying him in parts like a Mega Zord.
whatawaster wrote: » I think it means opposition penalties. Liverpool have got way more than 16 penalties at Anfield in the last 14 years.
LightningBolt wrote: » Can we not just ban stuff from Twitter being posted in here unless it's actually a verified player or the club posting. Seriously, the amount of Twitter ****e in these threads gives me a headache.
murpho999 wrote: » Quote for "yes", like for "no"!
jcsoulinger wrote: » It was obvious he meant 16 away team penalty's at anfield. This is painful!
5live wrote: » Aaahhhh. Now that makes way more sense. I was thinking 16 pens in 14 seasons was a bit on the low side.
Reina was noted for saving seven penalties out of the nine Villareal conceded in the season.
5starpool wrote: » Mark Clattenberg is reffing our game against Villa next weekend. Didn't THAT loss at home to Viaal last season come directly after their 7-0 game vs Chelsea last season? Hopefully history doesn't repeat itself again this year, despite the different venue. I'm already sh1tting myself thinking about Benteke at our defence again.
rarnes1 wrote: » I reckon there'll be a hat full of goals. Should be capable of getting a result there if we have ambitions of top 4. A win would be fantastic especially with Utd up after them
5starpool wrote: » It could well be a high scoring game as our defence still looks very vulnerable, and we try to attack at pace now.
rarnes1 wrote: » I can certainly see us scoring but also conceding. I'll say 2-2 or we might sneak a 3-2.
5starpool wrote: » Honestly with Liverpool, I could see anything from a 4-0 defeat to a 6-0 win, and anything in between. Hedging my bets there possibly. I will stick my neck out though and say we will not concede more than 4 or score more than 6. You heard it here first folks.
Dickerty wrote: » Or building a scale model of the Marie Celeste. In 112 easy parts.
mike65 wrote: » Watching SLY Sports, "Spurs have moved ahead of Liverpool to buy Willian" - cue mumbling words from AVB which indicate no such thing. :rolleyes:
gafferino wrote: » Make of it what you will but that pup Macca has posted the following:19 Aug 2013 14:57:33 The club are very confident that Willian will sign.. Cheers Macca
gafferino wrote: » Rumours of Southampton signing Osvaldo are wide of the mark, it was actually Jonny Depp.....
GTR63 wrote: » Yeah but ya have to buy glue and read those Magazines its all so awkward. + a Mega Zord has a kickass sword.
5starpool wrote: » Still waiting for Ince to make his senior debut for us after Macca confirmed that he had signed during the January transfer window.
gafferino wrote: » Yeah I know I know but i think he has been decent on other stuff at times. Anyway its all hocus pocus until we see an indian doctor, a creepy Ian Ayre and some dodgy elbow leaning photos.
5starpool wrote: » Just as I got into the ground on Saturday, Suarez walked within a few feet of me with his kid and I was pretty impassive, but 5 mins later I saw Zaf Iqbal from the same distance and I was nearly giddy with excitement.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w1.vanillicon.com/v2/11f397efbb618f280f346771bb290fe0.svg)
