Rangers FC On Field Gossip & Rumour Thread 2017 Mod Note in OP(Updated 14/08)

Nothing like a spot of cyber-bulling to distract you from your failing 2nd club :rolleyes:

Coillte_Bhoy

Dempsey wrote: »

Nothing like a spot of cyber-bulling to distract you from your failing 2nd club :rolleyes:

exaggerate much?

A group of posters ganging up on one and posting in a hostile manner towards him because they believe him to be someone else for the past few days, pretty much the definition. Dont think he's losing sleep over it though

Broxi_Bear_Eire

Dempsey wrote: »

A group of posters ganging up on one and posting in a hostile manner towards him because they believe him to be someone else for the past few days, pretty much the definition. Dont think he's losing sleep over it though

Sorry I don't think I ever posted that I thpught he was someone else so get yet fact right. As for posting in a hostile manner he has been hostile since he first appeared

Coillte_Bhoy

Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: »

Sorry I don't think I ever posted that I thpught he was someone else so get yet fact right. As for posting in a hostile manner he has been hostile since he first appeared

And neither did i and all i did was a wee bit of piss taking, we're all big boys here

CSF

I feel like I deserve zombie points for figuring out who he was after about 5 posts

CSF

Dempsey wrote: »

Nothing like a spot of cyber-bulling to distract you from your failing 2nd club :rolleyes:

Oh my. Cringe.

CSF wrote: »

I feel like I deserve zombie points for figuring out who he was after about 5 posts

Just had a wee peek at this guy's posts I notice he posted a fair few times about Man Utd,as much as they are a good club I can safely say I am not in the least bit interested in them.
http://touch.boards.ie/thread/2056302915/379/#post76931900
Zombie points ? A big fat 0.

blahfckingblah

Hagar the Nice. wrote: »

So what have I said to upset you then,eh?
I take it this Parkhead67 guy was hunted from here by the gang of 3,with a little help from a few backstabbers,I may be wrong,entirely wrong,but judging from a few comments on here he's been a bit of a naughty Bhoy (oops).
Me,I try to be fair in my comments although I was wrong with my h** comment,okay.

he called me a backstabber for disagreeing with his nonsense

Broxi_Bear_Eire

Hagar the Nice. wrote: »

Just had a wee peek at this guy's posts I notice he posted a fair few times about Man Utd,as much as they are a good club I can safely say I am not in the least bit interested in them.
http://touch.boards.ie/thread/2056302915/379/#post76931900
Zombie points ? A big fat 0.

But you seem to post in here every day I know you miss us xx

Eirebear

Dempsey wrote: »

A group of posters ganging up on one and posting in a hostile manner towards him because they believe him to be someone else for the past few days, pretty much the definition. Dont think he's losing sleep over it though

Or a group of posters reacting to a poster who spent a day on the Celtic thread talking about Rangers because he was so bitter, twisted and bigoted that he couldn't even come on here and ply his brand of nonsense?

Personally i couldn't give a flying **** if he's another poster or not, he's shown his colours for what they are.

blahfckingblah wrote: »

he called me a backstabber for disagreeing with his nonsense

Simple solution mate,a wee pm tell him to gtf should do the trick.

Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: »

But you seem to post in here every day I know you miss us xx

Only joined in June so that's well high on impossible to post every day,search my history if you so wish.

Eirebear wrote: »

Or a group of posters reacting to a poster who spent a day on the Celtic thread talking about Rangers because he was so bitter, twisted and bigoted that he couldn't even come on here and ply his brand of nonsense?

Personally i couldn't give a flying **** if he's another poster or not, he's shown his colours for what they are.

And those colours are the same as your previous two bosses.:D

Broxi_Bear_Eire

Hagar the Nice. wrote: »

Only joined in June so that's well high on impossible to post every day,search my history if you so wish.

Do you take me got an idiot you only joined in June big wow. You have to be a member of boards for month and post fifty times before you apply to get in here. You and I both know its since you started posting in the soccer forum I was talking about

Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: »

Do you take me got an idiot you only joined in June big wow. You have to be a member of boards for month and post fifty times before you apply to get in here. You and I both know its since you started posting in the soccer forum I was talking about

But I got away with it cos I done a cyber handshake with the head honcho.:D:D:D

CSF wrote: »

I feel like I deserve zombie points for figuring out who he was after about 5 posts

You can pick up your price at Charles Green's office.

Dempsey wrote: »

A group of posters ganging up on one and posting in a hostile manner towards him because they believe him to be someone else for the past few days, pretty much the definition. Dont think he's losing sleep over it though

If anyone's posting in a hostile manner it's Parkh... Hagar.

Hell, even his signature reeks of bitter obsession.

You think that people pointing out that your club benefited from a charity event that had all sorts of wrong attached to it is being bitter? Its just a fact really, why does it upset you?

Bounty Hunter

Re-Reg speculation is specifically against the forums charter so unless people want further warnings, infractions etc handed out (which I would hope nobody wants, I know I dont) please leave it at that.

Dempsey wrote: »

You think that people pointing out that your club benefited from a charity event that had all sorts of wrong attached to it is being bitter? Its just a fact really, why does it upset you?

All sorts of wrong ?

As in, benefiting the club with the permission of all parties involved ? i could see why that would be so wrong in your eyes :rolleyes:

And yeah, the fact he feels it necessary to make it his signature seems bitter.

Jelle1880 wrote: »

All sorts of wrong ?

As in, benefiting the club with the permission of all parties involved ? i could see why that would be so wrong in your eyes :rolleyes:

And yeah, the fact he feels it necessary to make it his signature seems bitter.

The Charity Regulator ruled that there was

breach of the trustees duties
misconduct on the part of the charity trustees as a whole
decisions being taken in ways which did not comply with the requirements of the Charity’s Trust Deed
issues of conflict of interest inherent in the Charity’s structure had not been appropriately dealt with

but the statement on the Sevco website made out like ye got a pat on the back!

The fact that you gloss over the truth and call him bitter makes me LOL!

Yeah, how horrible, think of the children that didn't get to eat because of that.

Once again you're going out of your way to attack Rangers, it's not unexpected but it is extremely tiresome and predictable.
I'm sure you and your new friend will get along brilliant

Jelle1880 wrote: »

Yeah, how horrible, think of the children that didn't get to eat because of that.

Once again you're going out of your way to attack Rangers, it's not unexpected but it is extremely tiresome and predictable.
I'm sure you and your new friend will get along brilliant

I'm not going out of my way to do anything, you brought it up! I'm not attacking Sevco, I'm attacking trustee that was working for the charity and the club and is of questionable character. I'm sure you and many like you are donating away to them, believing that the money is going to good causes and no chance of it finding its way into some slush fund because the people running the charity are beyond reproach!

Jelle1880 wrote: »

Yeah, how horrible, think of the children that didn't get to eat because of that.

Once again you're going out of your way to attack Rangers, it's not unexpected but it is extremely tiresome and predictable.
I'm sure you and your new friend will get along brilliant

If it was Celtic who had swindled the cash then I'd make sure I and my two kids never stepped inside CP ever again.
It seems as if you think its okay for your club to rob your very own fans,surely to goodness many Rangers fans would feel let down by their club.

Hagar the Nice. wrote: »

If it was Celtic who had swindled the cash then I'd make sure I and my two kids never stepped inside CP ever again.
It seems as if you think its okay for your club to rob your very own fans,surely to goodness many Rangers fans would feel let down by their club.

Nobody was robbed and nobody felt let down, since it was widely known before the game took place what would happen with the proceeds.

A complete non story which is being blown out of proportion to suit certain people's agenda.
And you can leave you fake worry about our fans, nobody's buying it.

Jelle1880 wrote: »

Nobody was robbed and nobody felt let down, since it was widely known before the game took place what would happen with the proceeds.

A complete non story which is being blown out of proportion to suit certain people's agenda.

So thousands of Gers fans went to two charity games knowing it was going not to charity but to RFC themselves,aye right.
Maybe you will be more charitable to Imran Ahmed because he's about to sue Sevco to the tune of £3.4 million,it never RANGERS but pours as the saying goes.

Hagar the Nice. wrote: »

So thousands of Gers fans went to two charity games knowing it was going not to charity but to RFC themselves,aye right.
Maybe you will be more charitable to Imran Ahmed because he's about to sue Sevco to the tune of £3.4 million,it never RANGERS but pours as the saying goes.

Actually they did (1 football game actually).
And so did AC Milan.

I'm sure you would know that though, since you seem to clued up about the events