Grumpypants wrote: » They have updated it, they had the xbox one version with the release date above it, but now its been changed to coming soon and the date is abpove the 360 version. I guess it was meant for a Gamescom reveal
Grayditch wrote: » Meh.
Richard Dower wrote: » It gets worse.......http://www.engadget.com/2013/08/07/xbox-one-xbox-live-gold/
FAILSAFE 00 wrote: » It doesn't. Who is going to pay 500 euro and not have a gold membership. That's like renting time on the track at mondello park and then not renting a car to drive on it.
Grayditch wrote: » Not really. It's more like driving around it on your own, which in fairness some people would prefer to do.
Grayditch wrote: » I don't see the video thing being an issue, really. People who want to get into the social side of video sharing etc will probably have Xbox live. Regarding the apps, though, I sign up to PS Plus because well, it's incredible value, but there are times it's ran out before pay day and it would annoy me if I couldn't use Netflix in that time.
GottaGetGatt wrote: » Can you launch or even look at the netflix library when the PS plus runs out?
shreddedloops wrote: » Presume you're talking about PS4. I'm pretty sure Sony have stated that PS+ won't be needed for services like Netflix.
Grayditch wrote: » Yeah, sure. You can play games online too, although that will change with PS4. Some games won't require PS Plus to play online. I wasn't even slightly disappointed to find out PS4 will need plus to play online, the amount of games they give you is impressive.
FAILSAFE 00 wrote: » if people don't want to play multiplayer then I'd recommend they get the PS4 then with the price difference and more accessibility to apps with the PSN plus. It makes more sense for offline players.
1ZRed wrote: » See I'm on PS+, anyone with a PS3 would be stupid not to, and I'll definitely be staying subbed, but that said, I was annoyed you had to pay for it. It was the handiest thing not having to pay out €50 annually on online play that's free everywhere else. They only did it because they saw xbox fans would gladly pay €50 for party chat and now look, it's mandatory.
C14N wrote: » If I had bought an Xbox One, I wouldn't have paid for Gold membership. If I ever get one, I still won't because I would rather take that €60 a year and get 2-3 games out of it.
FAILSAFE 00 wrote: » I'd be very impressed if you could get 2-3 Xbox One/ PS4 games for €60. Even second hand they will still be really expensive.
C14N wrote: » If I had bought an Xbox One, I wouldn't have paid for Gold membership. If I ever get one, I still won't because I would rather take that €60 a year and get 2-3 games out of it. This is true but it's a bad thing when you can objectively say that anyone not interested in playing online is much better off on the other console. Non-subscribers still make up almost half of the 360's owner-base. It's just going to be off-putting when you put the two side-by-side and see that one charges you a subscription for many features that the other gives for free. I'm not subbed really because PS3 is my second console (PC is first) and I have a massive list of games I need to play without Sony adding more every month. However, I think Sony wanted to charge for PS subs from the start, it's just that it would have been another hurdle for Sony to fall over on the PS3 launch. They could market free online as a selling point, even though it wasn't as reliable as XBL, which had a year of getting the hang of it.
1ZRed wrote: » I dunno, it's free everywhere else like on PC. I think they saw xbox users didn't care about spending money on it so they probably said they'd be foolish not to if they can get away with it this time. The fact that PS+ is so good makes a lot of people begrudgingly overlook it, me included. PSN will have all the xbox online features now so really there's not going to be a difference between them. The only difference is if Microsoft can match PS+ on games, which I doubt given their half assed attempt so far. I think that'll be the biggest factor in swaying people considering party chat and all that is there now.
NTMK wrote: » PS+ was a great marketing play by sony and was great for the subs too
COYVB wrote: » Wasn't good enough, given that so few people know about it outside the more core gamers
Newaglish wrote: » What makes you say that?
Dravokivich wrote: » After E3, when Microsoft announced a few free games in the run up to the launch of the Xbox One, a lot of people were surprised to find out it's been part of the PSN+ service for a long time.
FlyingIrishMan wrote: » I never saw anyone that was surprised.
Grayditch wrote: » Actually, if you think about it, PS Plus is perfect for people on a budget.