Stevie888 wrote: » No, when did I say I did?! I think you are confused. I said any trouble I have seen has almost always been caused by Irish people, not that I have met them all. That would be just stupid.
Stevie888 wrote: » A high proportion of Irish over in Oz are an absolute disgrace
Stevie888 wrote: » I'm going by what I saw first hand so no ignorance here
SherlockWatson wrote: » So again, I assume you've met the majority of Irish people in Australia to know this is true, first hand.
Wompa1 wrote: » You don't need to meet every single Irish person...even studies conducted and published in academic journals use sample groups. It's great how people get so worked up about generalizations that could be about them. But then others are completely acceptable.
TheDoc wrote: » The fella who wrote the article was on Newstalk this morning,
Highflyer13 wrote: » Not the first time Aussies have ran a story like this. Singling out one nationality is uncalled for imo.
SherlockWatson wrote: » He said he knew first hand that the majority of Irish people in Oz are a disgrace. Sample groups has nothing to do with this, you can't judge 20,000 people off a group of 100, don't be silly. The fact is, Steve doesn't know the majority of Irish people in Oz and has no idea if they are a disgrace or not, he's just talking hyperbolic nonsense.
Stevie888 wrote: » I don't think I ever said majority? I said high proportion, and I meant that in comparison with the other nationalities over there on the WHV. Do you need to know the majority of something to be able to have an opinion on it? Like I said, I've met at least a few hundred, and have seen many many more on nights out, Im also going on stories Ive heard from friends (not Irish or Australian), I think thats a good enough sized sample to have an informed opinion.
SherlockWatson wrote: » High proportion, is the majority. First hand doesn't include stories from friends either. Obviously if you're going by the Irish you meet out drinking you're sample group is already tainted.
SherlockWatson wrote: » High proportion, is the majority.
josip wrote: » :eek:
justforlaugh wrote: » I see anthony sharwood been getting some abusive messages on twitter
Stevie888 wrote: » Ah in fairness to him he seems a bit worked up
SherlockWatson wrote: » Worked up? Good one buddy,I'm not the one making up things to suit my agenda. Also if you could attack the post and not the poster that'd be lovely. CLINT.
Stevie888 wrote: » And what agenda is that now? And what do you think I've made up? Curious as to why you seem to have taken such offence, I'm merely stating my experiences.
SherlockWatson wrote: » Well you've clearly made up the fact that the high proportion of Irish people are a disgrace, as guess what, you don't know, nor have you met a "high proportion" of Irish people in Australia. I don't particularly care about the subject, was just passing through the thread when I saw you spouting hyperbolic nonsense.
Bogota wrote: » I did a working holiday in Oz and I can say that the Irish are nothing short of complete disgraces over there. Obviously there's a lot of hard working Irish but of all the nationalities that you come across over there we are by far the worst.
Jimoslimos wrote: » If your observations are accurate then that obviously means you spent most of your working holiday frequenting the same Oirish pubs in the same cities (Sydney/Melbourne) as the rest of the Irish WHMs you like to dismiss. If you aren't part of the solution, what does that make you then?
R P McMurphy wrote: » She is a right character, jesus that would be a fairly depressing hangover for her later on
Stevie888 wrote: » Why would you assume that it "obviously" means they spent most of their WHV in the **** hole Irish bars? Unfortunately the bad Irish you encounter over there go to other places aswel.
Grandeeod wrote: » What do you all make of this. Stereotyping or has this Aussie got a point?
Jimoslimos wrote: » Because if you believe that the worst troublemakers are the Irish then obviously you've spent your time surrounding yourself with only.