tayto lover wrote: » Shows he's rattled.
extra gravy wrote: » Rodgers accusing Arsenal of lacking class. This coming from the club that made the bids public with an owner who made a pathetic remark on the situation on Twitter. He has demanded loyalty from Suarez yet left Swansea the minute Liverpool came sniffing around. A hypocritical twat.
HazDanz wrote: » That and a defensive mid. I cannot see his logic in loaning Coq out without getting another one in.
Nuri Sahin wrote: » Well aren't you delightful. The vast majority of managers in the modern game are hypocrites. Big whoopty doo. But sure, you go and get all upset over Rodgers. At least you got some thanks heh. If you wanted to be taken seriously, you'd have bid a serious amount right off the bat. Not low balling well under what the minimum fee supposedly was going to be. £40M is what was being branded about in the media at least. Instead, you bid how much again originally? Then there is the comical £40M + 1M bid
Nuri Sahin wrote: » Well aren't you delightful. The vast majority of managers in the modern game are hypocrites. Big whoopty doo. But sure, you go and get all upset over Rodgers. At least you got some thanks heh.If you wanted to be taken seriously, you'd have bid a serious amount right off the bat. Not low balling well under what the minimum fee supposedly was going to be. £40M is what was being branded about in the media at least. Instead, you bid how much again originally? Then there is the comical £40M + 1M bid
Underground wrote: » Anyone with any basic knowledge of negotiating/haggling for anything knows that this is exactly what you don't do. As mentioned, you start out low, knowing full well your initial offer isn't good enough, but to test the waters and provide a basis for further negotiation. Bidding 50 million straight off the bat would have been retarded.
Yurt wrote: » So you increase your initial bid by a £1 ? Arsenal fans are comical.You think it makes any sense in Liverpool selling to Arsenal for that price? It would want to be near the £60m mark to even consider it.Liverpool are competing with Arsenal for top 4.If Arsenal get Suarez it significantly strengthens your squad and weakens Liverpool's. Also Suarez has 3 years left on his contract not 1 like RVP so we really are in no rush to sign him.If he decided to go down the Carlos Tevez route and sulk which is highly unlikely he'd still be better off at Liverpool than at Arsenal.We could wait a year and still get £40m plus for him off a team abroad. Suarez to Arsenal is simply never going to happen. Wenger won't spend £60m or even close to that.
jester77 wrote: » Nothing wrong with Arsenal's behaviour. Suarez's market value is rated at 37 million pounds, so Arsenal are offering over market value. I can understand why Liverpool would be defensive but they are being delusional if they think he is worth anywhere near 60 million. For a player who clearly wants to leave, if Arsenals value of 40 million is so bad, then why are there not a stack of better offers on the table?
mike65 wrote: » Guardian says you're finishing 5th. Season Preview.http://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2013/aug/05/premier-league-preview-arsenal?commentpage=1
rarnes1 wrote: » Rodgers seems confident Suarez is staying at Liverpool. I'd say unless Madrid come in he's staying put.
Soups123 wrote: » He seems very rattled for someone who is confident
speedboatchase wrote: » He's staying put unless he submits a transfer request and/or we bid £50m. I hope one or the other happens but I'm not so sure.