bad2dabone wrote: » He is very stubborn and it’s really frustrating to watch, but he has his philosophies and despite the drawbacks (such as us clawing our hair out at times like this) he has kept us eating at the top table while building a stadium which none of our rivals have had to do, he’s delivered success on and off the field and although I readily admit that if the coming season is a failure then I will no longer be in support of him, he does deserve more respect than he’s currently getting from certain posters. Far more respect. He’s definitely due criticism but I’ll always be thankful to what he’s done for the club. As I’ve said before it’s the managers who inherit Arsenal after he’s gone who’ll benefit the most from his time in charge.
bad2dabone wrote: » I know GG won 2 leagues and I think an FA cup?, but what I’m saying is we did have long gaps between trophies before him.
speedboatchase wrote: » Maybe old habits die hard but it appears that after so many years of austerity, Wenger can't bring himself to do that, and that's why I consider him to be our main stumbling block right now.
Looper007 wrote: » It's been nearly ten year's, We need to stop leaving in the past about all his glories. Yes he did brilliantly but he deserves criticism for the here and now and simply he's to blame for this downfall. Ferguson lived on the here and now and spent when it was need and made UTD stronger every season. We have great stadium and facilities but Football is about winning things too and we simply have flopped on that. I have no regret's calling him a joke. This club say's Arsenal not Arsene Wenger.
bad2dabone wrote: » no chance. none. Our squad is far too small. we've currently got 1 left back (monreal injured already) with gibbs somewhat injury prone, 3 CB's, 5 midfielders, 3 wide forwards (not counting Ryo) and 2 strikers. with CL, FA cup, PL and CL cup we're simply too light in numbers, I'd say too light in numbers even to be confident of a CL spot. To leave the squad as shallow as it is now is insane and I believe, negligent. However I agree with Wenger about Sanogo, he could be fantastic.
Marty McFly wrote: » While I agree currently our squad is to small and needs some additions we have 4 wide forwards in Walcott, Chamberlain, Podolski and Gnabry who I'm hoping thinking we might see a good bit more of this season.
.jacksparrow. wrote: » All terrible options on the wing.
Marty McFly wrote: » :pac: what? Yeh because Podolski and Walcott both done so terribly last season playing there.
.jacksparrow. wrote: » Podolski is a goal poacher, he is a terrible winger, can't beat his man and just plays it backwards, much more effective in and around the box, Walcott is the same, most of his goals came from been upfront both good players but definitely not good wingers.
Hyzepher wrote: » 10 years is actually not that long to go without a title - just ask any long term Spurs or Chelsea fan. Even the great Liverpool of the 70s & 80s had a very lean spell beforehand - as did UTD before SAF. Even for Arsenal 10 yrs isn't our longest run without a title. If you think about that for a minute and then add in the fact that we have not been outside the top 4 in that "lean" period AND also built a new stadium that is the envy of most our rivals - especially in London, I think you need to acknowledge the success of AW and the board. I know fans measure success by trophy count but if we are to have a lean period then the last 10 years is pretty awesome in that respect.
Paulegend wrote: » i find it funny that wenger is saying he is doing all the talking behind closed doors yet he keeps mentioning wanting to sign suarez in the media. considering all the crap that barca "put arsenal through" in regards cesc i find it kinda ironic that there is no problem using similar tactics. i guess its not the same thing though??
Marty McFly wrote: » Podolski can't beat his man? Are you sure you watched Arsenal play at all last season? Just play it backwards? Seriously? Podoski was one of the few players who when he got the ball last season went and attacked and was always looking to make things happen him and Cazorla linked up brilliantly at times. I'm not sure on the stat of were Walcotts goals came from but a lot of them came from playing out wide, plus what about all his assists?
"I don't want to speak about Suarez, because that is between Liverpool and Arsenal. We will completely respect what Liverpool wants to do. "We want to (sign the player) if it is feasible in an amicable way.
bad2dabone wrote: » no chance. none. Our squad is far too small. we've currently got 1 left back (monreal injured already) with gibbs somewhat injury prone, 3 CB's, 5 midfielders, 3 wide forwards (not counting Ryo) and 2 strikers. with CL, FA cup, PL and CL cup we're simply too light in numbers, I'd say too light in numbers even to be confident of a CL spot.
However I agree with Wenger about Sanogo, he could be fantastic.
Fuzzy_Dunlop wrote: » Most of Walcott's goals came from playing from the wing. He's more effective from there than up front because he has a more space to run in to.
meriwether wrote: » Title in 89 and 91, Coke and FA cup double in 93, cup winners cup in 94, Coke cup/whatever it was called in 87 (i think). Interspersed with Wrexham dumping us out of the FA cup in 1992, Tony Adams arrested for being 17 times over the limit when crashing, brawling our way around the division for a few years, brawlig with United and having 2 points deducted, Winterburn following McClair to the touchline when he missed the peno, Paul Davis punching some spurs prick, Cockerill I think. I still love George.
.jacksparrow. wrote: » Ye usually into an alley and looses the ball, I'm talking about beating the full back here, not scoring goals. As a typical winger which beats their man and delivers a ball into the box he is poor and has been for years.
.jacksparrow. wrote: » Seriously I think you need to have a look back, he can't beat his man he is too slow and doesn't have the technical ability, I like him as a player but not a winger.
meriwether wrote: » Hes not a "typical" winger, whatever that is, which is your first mistake. Neither was Freddie or Pires.