speedboatchase wrote: » As opposed to us, who can attract them but will never pay their club's valuation?
speedboatchase wrote: » Giroud didn't cost 4m. Soldado is twice his price and got double the amount of league goals Giroud got last year. And why should fans just accept that Spurs now have a better striker than us, without CL and probably with half the initial summer budget that we have.
cathalio11 wrote: » Trying to compare Giroud to Soldado is silly. Soldado has never played a single game in the Premier League (praying that he didn't have a fling with Everton 10 years ago). Meanwhile in Giroud's first season, he gave a very sound goals and assists return. Soldado will be doing very well if he can match that in his first season.
Looper007 wrote: » Giroud is good solid player but he's not a striker who score you 35 a season. That's what we need, the guy who takes that one chance at Old Trafford and knocks three past a Cardiff or Hull. It takes Giroud three to four chances before he scores.
ugsparky wrote: » I thought we would go for Higuan but I did say that it's all about balance in the team. What players compliment what we have already ? Not sure that Fellani fits this shape - maybe as a replacement for Arteta and use Arteta more in a forward role - allowing Arsene to use Rosicky/Arteta as replacements for Jack/Ox or Ramsey during games or when we have CL & PL games in quick succession. Is Sanogo the replacement for Gervinho ? I'm not sure that Suarez is what we want either - he's not a prolific goalscorer. I'm thinking we'll be looking at a player who plays between a striker and the midfield who can score and create (Rooney or Fellani ?). TBH I am struggling to think of players who can fit our system without changing the system entirely ...
ugsparky wrote: » Is Sanogo the replacement for Gervinho ?
greendom wrote: » The day you have one positive thing to day about Arsenal is the day I may treat your posts seriously. If there's a negative angle you have it covered.
GavRedKing wrote: » If Real sign Bale then Liverpools last chance of getting Suarez out to a foreign team looks all but gone, theyed be wise to sell up to the highest and probably only bidder in England, you guys. The longer it goes on the less time a replacement of any calibre can be found for Liverpool.
Fuzzy_Dunlop wrote: » We're after missing out on signing that lad from One Direction ffs :mad:
jonny666 wrote: » Back to Arsenal and some people on here need to really chill out. OK its not ideal to be getting players in late(its not even that late) but im confident we will get the players we need.
speedboatchase wrote: » Wenger's Google Hangout is starting shortly at this link:https://plus.google.com/events/cdlgcu0rfr9mt5f0gq3q6vcqtkc?partnerid=gplp0
L'prof wrote: » It's saying 3 hours in the link on my phone, but I'm abroad so that might have something to do with it. How soon?
Hyzepher wrote: » Although I'm not losing faith just yet, but if Bale does leave Spurs then this summer will have dealt Arsenal the perfect conditions to push on towards winning something. All the teams above us have changed managers, and if we take Suarez then teams below us will either have changed manager (Everton) or lost a very important player in key positions (Bale/Suarez). If there was ever a year to spend big then this is it. Conditions like this don't come around often. I say spend the 45m+ on Suarez and find two more players to fill key positions for 35m+. In the long term it will be far better than spending 50m now and 30m next year
Deleted User wrote: » Players we need for what?
speedboatchase wrote: » Try this link, it's just begun: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3cyVJeZrHOU&sns=tw