HandsomeJonny wrote: » No. You should definitely start using more steroids. It will do you the world of good.
Miike wrote: » Yes, yes there is.
Hoins wrote: » Where then?
kneemos wrote: » Are you trying to have an argument with yourself?
Miike wrote: » Also judging by your question one can assume you won't understand the studies or the manner in which they are presented so allow me to sum it up for you. If there was no negative effects of Androgenic-anabolic steroids, the pharmaceutical industry would be wiping the floor with AAS users and hitting the FDA (Etc.) with research 24/7 to get them put on the shelves. The steroid prevalence in the 'body-building' industry (and I use that term VERY lightly in this case...) is one of multi-million dollar underground sales per anum, do you think pharmaceutical companies don't want to be a part of that?
Hoins wrote: » From what I understand the pharmaceutical industry has a massive involvement in the ASS industry. Not every safe drug is available on a shelve, No?
Miike wrote: » Well I should also point out, AAS's are used "safely" in modern medicine all the time when it comes to growth related issues. However what you need to understand is the fundamentals of what the body can take and how it responds. Secondly, no most AAS vials that 'body-builders' use are "cooked". They're made in a somewhat make shift lab then vialed and shipped. (From my own personal experience of watching people put them into their bodies) Finally, No. Not all drugs that are safe on a shelf but that's a bit narrow of the nature of the substance when we talk about AAS. But all in all some counties such a Thailand and Mexico you can walk into a chemist and buy as much of the stuff as you like. So... to each their own
Hoins wrote: » Agree with you all the way, but still the question lies.
Miike wrote: » There is ample research to portray the negative effects to answer that. If you google the stuff I previously mentioned [/quote Trust me ive googled this, that's why I came here. Im very aware of the short term effects a reversible effects but nothing proves to be perminent not reversible if taking in moderation ( such as testosternone replacement therapy) Thanks for your input man, much appreciated
Sacramento wrote: » ollox? Yup.
Hoins wrote: » What gave you that idea? Because I simply asked where??? The whole point of the thread was to find out if anyone had come across studies that concluded perminent effects..Are you trying to start an argument with something you haven't got a clue in?
Vomit wrote: » The problem with them is abuse.
Nemeses wrote: » Would help if the OP put the question in context.. Then I'm sure I could give a better response... an awesome response. A savage AH classic response.