SamHall wrote: » Why is it not deemed acceptable for the ladies?
SamHall wrote: » On our streets? Seeing my fair share of men, bare chested with the moobs walking around Dublin today. Why is it not deemed acceptable for the ladies? We need more Boob's on the capitals streets goddamit! :mad:
TheBody wrote: » More boobs mean men walking around with their shorts/trousers in the "tented position". Somebody could get their eye poked out!!
Alias G wrote: » Its not acceptable for men to walk around streets topless. Only toerags do it. If you're not at the beach, put you poxy shirt on.
Frank Black wrote: » Because of the boobs, mostly it's because of the boobs.
TheBody wrote: » More boobs mean men walking around with their shorts/trousers in the "tented position". Dwarves/small children Somebody could get their eye poked out!!
The Backwards Man wrote: » I was at a funeral on Monday and even the priest had no shirt on.*
HardLuckWoman wrote: » Why would you get your eye poked out? What would you be doing to have your face so close for your eyes to be poked?
Legs.Eleven wrote: » Jaysus it'd be great if it was acceptable to go topless for women. Heat here is in the mid-30s and I get around on a bike. With a heavy-duty bra and a top over that, chaffy boobs alert. You just want to throw the whole thing off and let them hang like dangling cows' udders (or sit upright perfectly pert with nipples in the air like proud soldiers on guard in my case Hubba!). Kind of mad when you think about the fact that you can't simply because boobs are too damn sexy for men. Stupid really. I just wanna throw away the shackles of the patriarchal society...man!! 3 = boobs.
Shanotheslayer wrote: » Anybody who goes on holidays to a hot country 27degrees say men will walk around topless and it's perfectly acceptable. In Ireland 27degrees and they're knackers for doing it. Stupid.
Grayson wrote: » That might because it's mainly knackers who do it. They were knackers before they took their tops off and lathered themselves in baby oil/butter
littlemisshobo wrote: » it shouldn't be acceptable either way... but basically cause women would be sexual assaulted or raped...