Stheno wrote: » Zirtek sent me to sleep, best ever thing I found for hayfever was weleda hayfever pills In motoring news OH and I are pondering if he should buy a very well vouched for (our mechanic) E200 which is 2000 and try to sell his 03 c5
MetzgerMeister wrote: » Depending on the year, they gave massive electrical trouble along with mechanical trouble. My boss in my last job had a 2005 E200 and he had it in the garage being repaired more than he drove it. He was only the 2nd owner and the car was a year old at the time. Diff shat itself, wipers came on when he indicated left, no headlights when the radio was on - all stupid things like that!
Dr.Rieux wrote: » The 05 and 00 were different models. The 00 is the W210 (I think). I know nothing about them, have seen a fair few with rusty arches and think people put the nasty chrome strips there to hide the rust so potentially something to look out for
Bpmull wrote: » I put diesel in my car today. And basically I've been doing all town driving all week in and out to work I have to drive through central Kilkenny to get to work. 250 km to 13.5 litres of diesel that 52.3 mpg and that was working it out properly. I was amazed Its some going for tipping around town 12km at a time trips.
MuppetCheck wrote: » That's exceptionally good. I thought I was doing well when I refilled today. First tank, good mix of driving and not mothering the car, stop start malarkey off and climate control on all the time and it did 46mpg which I thought was good for a tight new engine.
Ded_Zebra wrote: » This week so far I have driven 850km. Over that run, well the first tank, I averaged 7.1l/100km, that's 40mpg! Pretty good for a car powered by the correct fuel:p
eringobragh wrote: » 11.32l/100km , 24.96MPG - Some hard urban driving :pac: .
Ded_Zebra wrote: » This week so far I have driven 850km.
Ded_Zebra wrote: » Mine was down to 32MPG it town driving but that's the worst I have got. I would love to drive the same route again slower to see what I can get the fuel consumption up to I was driving fairly quick all week. What can the 2 get on a long run/average on a tank of long runs? It is a very dull motoring forum when we talk about fuel consumption:pac::o
challengemaster wrote: » 1050 miles since last saturday :pac:
Ded_Zebra wrote: » That's a decent chunk alright:eek: I only drive about 15,000km (in my car) a year so to do 850km in 5 days is a lot more than I'm used to! It'll be over the thousand by the end of Sunday.The car as you would probably expect was faultless over the entire time never missed a beat. Tomorrow I'm going to reward it with a good deep clean:) Not having cruse control gives you an awful sore leg on long trips, wonder if it was an optional extra on the Levin???
eringobragh wrote: » yeah I did a sleeper run to galway once, 100kph the whole way needle didn't even pass the quarter tank mark, so would have been around the high 30's early 40s.......most boring drive of my life ever...let it rip out of both tolls though, so that way has skewed the figures abit.
eringobragh wrote: » Yeah I reckon so - the MR2 had it on one or two - impossible to find one , the factory one as its so rare..
challengemaster wrote: » lets just say I'm glad its daysul Just washed mine earlier, it's been neglected for the last 3-4 weeks. Have to say, Orchard autocare citrus pre clean is the bizness.
Katunga wrote: » Got my air con recharged in fast fit in Galway for €39. My car is like a fridge. No gas in it at all he said. No pressure drop after he recharged it. So no leak. He was saying it was strange to have no pressure with no leak.
Supergurrier wrote: » May have to head their way. Now clearly the only solution is to come spend the money you saved on some carpet from me down the road !
dgt wrote: » Best £40 spent in a while :cool: Hopefully that'll be double the standard bhp sometime later next week
toastedpickles wrote: » Sooo, I was tinkering with the Astra today, and took off the sorry excuse that is the front bumper to see how I'd go fitting one properly, this greeted mehttp://i42.tinypic.com/qz4ro9.jpghttp://i43.tinypic.com/6z90us.jpghttp://i42.tinypic.com/2my5hj6.jpghttp://i40.tinypic.com/2m6le8n.jpg Now personally I don't know if this should look as battered as it does, but something tells me it should be flat, it looks like it's been crashed slightly So should it look like that? And can it be taken off and replaced?
Ded_Zebra wrote: » It looks like it has taken a few small knocks, I wouldn't be too worried about it, just the bumper doing it's job:pac: It may mean that it's a bit trickier to re-mount the bumper as the mounting points might have moved slightly.
toastedpickles wrote: » That's what I was thinking, it looks like it can be taken off but I'm not 100% on that
Ded_Zebra wrote: » I can be. Does this mean that you bought a new bumper for it?
BUBBLE WRAP wrote: » Tell us more... :P