mcrods wrote: » I like the full bush. Does anyone else? Like its normal and sexy looking!
mike65 wrote: » Porn!
Cupcake_Crisis wrote: » Some women feel it's more hygienic and.........porn
frag420 wrote: » Some guy are carpet munchers, I prefer lino.....
justryan wrote: » Into a bit of retro OP?
Esoteric_ wrote: » Personal preference? I hate having hair on my legs, privates or under my arms, so I shave/wax. If a guy doesn't like it, he can feck off. I do it for me, nobody else.
mcrods wrote: » Surely though some women out there don't shave it? Like on a Saturday would most have it shaved? Even if in longer relationship ?
Johnny Electricity wrote: » That's very unlikely!
Wibbs wrote: » As people vary so does full bush. Nothing wrong with hair down there, but with some ladies it looks like they're wearing a pair of victorian bathing trunks. Neatly trimmed does it for me.
mike65 wrote: » It intrigues me how we got to about 20 years ago without (m)any woman thinking "hey I need to mow my lawn"
bluewolf wrote: » Used to be very common yonks ago hence merkins, no? The Oxford Companion to the Body dates the origin of the pubic wig to the 1450s. According to the publication, women would shave their pubic hair for personal hygiene and to combat pubic lice.
mcrods wrote: » Can we go back to that time? Least full bush is normal