Leaving Cert 2012-2013 OT Thread Part 2

I'll go wherever tbh !

peekachoo

Man.UnitedLad wrote: »

So, can we have it in Tipp?

+1 for Tipp!

decisions

Man.UnitedLad wrote: »

So, can we have it in Tipp?

We already have a free gaff in Dublin lined up.

Prodigious wrote: »

It's as simple as this. If you don't respect yourself, don't expect respect from anyone else.

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRkbdGvLkL4wZbCYlZz0uY74mEmtErDHOwBGWEHi2rwkH7G2n0V9w

Man.UnitedLad wrote: »

So, can we have it in Tipp?

Quick question, where ever this party is going to be, where are we all going to sleep. I don't know anyone living in Dublun, the midlands or Tipp for that matter.

decisions wrote: »

We already have a free gaff in Dublin lined up.

2 if LCS follows through.

decisions wrote: »

We already have a free gaff in Dublin lined up.

For realz?

HugsiePie wrote: »

Quick question, where ever this party is going to be, where are we all going to sleep. I don't know anyone living in Dublun, the midlands or Tipp for that matter.

I'm assuming if they let you party in the gaff they'll let you crash!

Im serious out of the loop here.

Help me out here people?

Prodigious wrote: »

I'm assuming if they let you party in the gaff they'll let you crash!

Coolio

ray2012

Roscommon, ye can all sleep in the field.

ray2012 wrote: »

Roscommon, ye can all sleep in the field.

Only an hour journey WAY HEY

AndyMc wrote: »

Im serious out of the loop here.

Me too.

Is there an actual party in the works?!

randylonghorn

Prodigious wrote: »

It's as simple as this. If you don't respect yourself, don't expect respect from anyone else.

It really isn't that simple on a number of fronts.

The most obvious of which (and the one which we were talking about) is: why is it different for lads and for girls?

Monsieur Folie wrote: »

Me too.

Is there an actual party in the works?!

By the sounds if it, 3 or 4

Raeral

AndyMc wrote: »

Somebody please fill me in.

Basiclly, we're gonna recreate this in Prodge's gaf after the lc :P

I can haz invite?

Prodigious wrote: »

It's as simple as this. If you don't respect yourself, don't expect respect from anyone else.

Ah here, that's not it at all.

Do you not see how unfair it is for a girl that if you or I were to sleep around we'd be "legends" whereas if they were to do the exact same thing they'd be labelled whores? It's the same act, the gender shouldn't matter, either condemn everyone or condemn no one!

randylonghorn wrote: »

It really isn't that simple on a number of fronts.

The most obvious of which (and the one which we were talking about) is: why is it different for lads and for girls?

For starters, the man is perceived as the initiator (whatever you want to call it), by tradition. Bedding a woman is seen as a success, then, since she was almost a conquest. (Yes, pathetic)
Conversely, if a woman is promiscuous, she's being "conquered" and won very often, and therefore holds lesser value.

I think.
Really I have no f*cking clue but I think it's along those lines.

The Pheasant2

Hey guys "The Pheasant" here, managed to lock myself out of my account and the change password email won't send for some reason (Randy you wouldn't have any idea how to sort that would you?).....but anyway yeah gaff at mine woo

Prodigious wrote: »

For starters, the man is perceived as the initiator (whatever you want to call it), by tradition. Bedding a woman is seen as a success, then, since she was almost a conquest. (Yes, pathetic)
Conversely, if a woman is promiscuous, she's being "conquered" and won very often, and therefore holds lesser value.

I think.
Really I have no f*cking clue but I think it's along those lines.

We're not in the middle ages any more man.

So whos organising this party?

randylonghorn

Prodigious wrote: »

For starters, the man is perceived as the initiator (whatever you want to call it), by tradition. Bedding a woman is seen as a success, then, since she was almost a conquest. (Yes, pathetic)
Conversely, if a woman is promiscuous, she's being "conquered" and won very often, and therefore holds lesser value.

I think.
Really I have no f*cking clue but I think it's along those lines.

In terms of where the attitudes stem from, probably not that far off.

Isn't it time we all fecking grew up tho?!

Raeral

The Pheasant2 wrote: »

Hey guys "The Pheasant" here, managed to lock myself out of my account and the change password email won't send for some reason (Randy you wouldn't have any idea how to sort that would you?).....but anyway yeah gaff at mine woo

Are you really though? How do we know your not just some pretender trying to get our hopes up before crushing all our dreams and wishes in one fell swoop?? (Man this leaving cert has really got to me :P)

Peregrine

Prodigious wrote: »

For starters, the man is perceived as the initiator (whatever you want to call it), by tradition. Bedding a woman is seen as a success, then, since she was almost a conquest. (Yes, pathetic)
Conversely, if a woman is promiscuous, she's being "conquered" and won very often, and therefore holds lesser value.

I think.
Really I have no f*cking clue but I think it's along those lines.

Yup, it's pathetic but it's true, that's where the whole thing comes from. Don't agree with it at all though. It's still the case between animals

Monsieur Folie wrote: »

We're not in the middle ages any more man.

True and most people's ideas have evolved, same cannot be said for some other hypocrites.

Where & when is this gaff available for partying? :P

The Pheasant2

Raeral wrote: »

Are you really though? How do we know your not just some pretender trying to get our hopes up before crushing all our dreams and wishes in one fell swoop?? (Man this leaving cert has really got to me :P)

Haha no I'm genuine, I've been organising it a bit with Prodge but I can't get into my other account

Decisions is gonna pm the details after applied maths. Don't raise too much attention or we'll have a project x on our hands. (Admittedly sounds great, but don't wanna mess up your mans house :P )