PatDee wrote: » New Standard???? Please explain....
iceberger wrote: » ugglasdav - Is your wireless device far from the modem? And many walls in between? thanks
superleedsdub wrote: » Some additional issues I noted when trying to configure the technicolor router (some already noted in this thread) - I could not change the IP address of the router (I tried many times, each time I had to set it back to 192.168.0.1) - Ditto for setting up a DMZ -5ghz wireless network does not work, the UPC technician I spoke to on saturday confirmed this to me (
superleedsdub wrote: » I had disabled the wireless network on the technicolor as I was using my own router for wi-fi, but the UPC guy was able to turn on the wireless network from his end.
burt wrote: » Is nobody else totally and utterly freaked out by this?
<script src="/language/dutch.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script src="/language/english.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
DECEiFER wrote: » This post might be of interest to some of you who want to bridge:http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=85274658#post85274658 I can't promise anything but it's worth a shot. I also can't test it myself as I'm still using the Cisco EPC3925. The instructions for doing so are not far off the EPC3925 instructions, found here:http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2056758726 EDIT: Sh1te, I just now noticed someone else posted a version of it at the top of this page. What you might want to do is change the following line from the version above: <script src="/language/dutch.js" type="text/javascript"></script> To: <script src="/language/english.js" type="text/javascript"></script> That should hopefully make it easier to read.
poisonedstream wrote: » Good call, just now noticed that. I feel like being a space monkey, so lets see what happens :-P.
DECEiFER wrote: » The big question is, does it stick the router into bridge mode? I'm absolutely dying to know...
poisonedstream wrote: » You will have to wait until Saturday :-P. Gotta get me a router that does the job first. I'm looking at this : http://www.amazon.co.uk/TP-Link-TL-WDR4900-Wireless-Gigabit-Router/dp/B00ATB28SM/ref=sr_1_14?ie=UTF8&qid=1372077934&sr=8-14&keywords=gigabit+router
DECEiFER wrote: » Ah ya fecker! Hopefully someone else will give it a shot and report back today. :P Looks like a good router choice, it'll kick the ass out of whatever UPC supplies.
poisonedstream wrote: » LOl, I might do it as a midnight project tonight if I'm bored :-p. This badboy http://www.amazon.co.uk/TP-Link-Archer-AC1750-Wireless-Gigabit/dp/B00CEB53MS/ref=dp_ob_title_ce looks quite interesting but no adapter I know of can receive speeds like that over wireless. This is half the price and besides wireles speed I can't see a difference .http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B00810P80S/ref=noref?ie=UTF8&psc=1&s=computers
DECEiFER wrote: » Spend up to your limit to get the best product. What might not be heavily supported now might be widespread in a year. This might be the best option, a good compromise:http://www.amazon.co.uk/TP-Link-TL-WDR4900-Wireless-Gigabit-Router/dp/B00ATB28SM/ref=sr_1_14?ie=UTF8&qid=1372077934&sr=8-14&keywords=gigabit+router
poisonedstream wrote: » Lol, I love random conversations about routers :-P. Sure, when the source editing above gets me bridge modem (gotta think positive!) I'll post the router too :-P
DECEiFER wrote: » Not trying to be a dick (well, I am really) but shouldn't you test to see if the HTML injection does the trick with the TC2700 first before buying a router? I know you could double NAT if it doesn't, but still. :P