pepper180 wrote: » So.. Who is destroying Sunderland?... :eek:
Mr Blobby wrote: » Anyone willing to sell a 89+ midfielder? I've cash + 2 players
eireannBEAR wrote: » what the name of your club? iv two wings 89 and two centers 90.
tupac_healy wrote: » Hey Mac, just spotted in the extra game rules there is an option 'smfa monitoring transfers - YES' Can that be turned off? Would save a lot of hassle!
soap1978 wrote: » it should be left on,notting to hide,unless you are up to something:D
tupac_healy wrote: » I think Real/Malaga might have a different opinion! Anyhow, just a suggestion;)
Munster Magic wrote: » Any chance you will do a similar deal for Dawson???:D
Teamshadowclan wrote: » Happy with 38th given I was in the high 50s last time round The difference is Dawson is younger, so still has a chance to rise, and is my forth choice defender. I'd let him go for 15m or the equivalent, cause I reckon I could get a decent 4th choice defender in, but I'm not desperate to see him go, nor do I care if he stays.
eireannBEAR wrote: » yeah the real managers a time waster to.
GT_TDI_150 wrote: » :rolleyes: wouldnt sell Ronaldo right?!:D
king size mars bar wrote: » is parker for sale?
eireannBEAR wrote: » do you want parker?
Teamshadowclan wrote: » Now, Malaga on the other hand know how to make a tempting offer...going to have to sleep on that one...
GT_TDI_150 wrote: » Ok peeps as promised... lets not quote this post as it will make the thread hard to read ... or exclude the table if you do) I think it warrants highlighting that São Paulo D3 and Genoa CFC D4 are sitting pretty in the top5 :eek: , .... and Zenit D2, Bayer Leverkusen D2, Valencia D2, Shanghai Shenhua D3 and Spartak Moskva D3 are all inside the top10!!! ** Disclaimer : lads, I tried to get everyone's rating/division right ... apologies if there are any errors in the list, pop me a PM and I'll correct them.** Club Ranking Division Borussia Dortmund 1 Division 1 Paris Saint-Germain 2 Division 1 West Bromwich 3 Division 1São Paulo :eek: 4 Division 3Genoa CFC :eek: 5 Division 4 Liverpool 6 Division 1Zenit 7 Division 2Bayer Leverkusen 8 Division 2Valencia 9 Division 2Shanghai Shenhua 10 Division 3Spartak Moskva 10 Division 3 Olympiacos 12 Division 3 Barcelona 13 Division 1 Bordeaux 14 Division 4 RCD Espanyol 14 Division 4 Club América 16 Division 4 ACF Fiorentina 17 Division 2 Atlético Madrid 17 Division 1 FC Porto (me :cool:) 19 Division 2 Arsenal 20 Division 1 AZ 21 Division 4 Udinese Calcio 22 Division 2 Marseille 23 Division 4 AJ Auxerre 24 Division 4 Aston Villa 25 Division 2 FC Schalke 26 Division 2 Galatasaray SK 27 Division 4 Besiktas JK 28 Division 3 Everton 28 Division 1 Hamburger SV 28 Division 4 Newcastle United 28 Division 2 Real Madrid 28 Division 1 Hannover 96 33 Division 3 US Palermo 34 Division 3 AS Roma 35 Division 2 Fenerbahçe SK 35 Division 2 Shakhtar Donetsk 37 Division 2 Tottenham Hotspur 38 Division 1 AC Milan 39 Division 1 Bayern München 40 Division 1 Juventus 41 Division 1 Málaga CF 42 Division 4 Internazionale 43 Division 2 Athletic Club 44 Division 3 Portsmouth 45 Division 1 Sporting CP 46 Division 3 VfB Stuttgart 46 Division 3 Panathinaikos 48 Division 3 Anzhi 49 Division 2 SSC Napoli 50 Division 1 Ajax 51 Division 2 Manchester City 51 Division 1 PSV 53 Division 2 VfL Wolfsburg 54 Division 1 Lyon 55 Division 3 SS Lazio 55 Division 3 Manchester United 57 Division 1 FC Basel 58 Division 4 Flamengo 59 Division 4 Werder Bremen 60 Division 3 Celtic 61 Division 4 Sevilla 62 Division 3 Vélez Sársfield 63 Division 3 RSC Anderlecht 64 Division 4 Rangers 65 Division 4 Sporting de Braga 66 Division 3 Grêmio 67 Division 3 FC Twente 68 Division 2 Chelsea 69 Division 1 Dynamo Kyiv 70 Division 2 Boca Juniors 71 Division 4 Estudiantes 71 Division 3 SL Benfica 73 Division 2 Chivas 74 Division 4 CSKA Moskva 75 Division 4 Los Angeles 75 Division 2 Standard Liège 75 Division 4 Palmeiras 78 Division 4 Sunderland 78 Division 1 Cruzeiro No mgr Division 3
Mr.Chong Magoo wrote: » With such a large league with so many new managers it would be very hard to police this league from cheats if you turn off monitoring. My vote is leave it on.......It tends to go wild west when there off.
tupac_healy wrote: » I know your right, but I was just offering the suggestion because of what happened with Malaga/Real, there were a lot here that thought that deal was sound for both parties and should have been sanctioned...... Personally I totally agree with you, it would become a bit wild Wild West, but its only fair that the option is at least discussed....
tupac_healy wrote: » Long story, end result was a Madrid/isco swap sort of, with some side deals too for other players! It was a good deal for both sides IMO
GT_TDI_150 wrote: » Madrid bought isco for 26m Madrid bought mendy for 3m Malaga bought modric for 16m I think roughly this was the deal, personally dont think it should have been canceled, Both modric an isco went cheaper than expected but the loss on both deals cancelled out the other. No difference between what they agreed vs isco going for 45m and modric going for 35.