Sleepy wrote: » Unless you've put down a crazy deposit I'd seriously re-consider your venue OP. Between trying to charge you for a bar extension, Celtic Tiger corkage charges and the fee for cutting the cake I'd be asking if they were looking for the Right of First Night and all!
Sleepy wrote: » People remember 3 things about your wedding: the food, the band and the wine. Spend the money on these and cut back on everything else. No wine and an early end to the night will seriously impact on peoples enjoyment of your day.
clint_silver wrote: » Ive seen quotes from hotels that are rock bottom for bare minimum, might be doing 35e a head. But everything, like op's case, is extra. you might get more wiggle room elsewhere but pay 50e a head so are you really saving by the time the maths are done? If I was getting hitched today Id take the rock bottom price and start working up rather than the "thinking I was getting a deal at 50e a head, but in fact am not" deal.
Fittle wrote: » Anyway, I won't be paying the 4.95 per slice of cake either! I'd rather have no cake!
username123 wrote: » Disagree, people remember the booze and the music - thats it. Mass produced hotel food is not my idea of a nice meal, by the time it hits the table its usually rubbery or not hot anymore. Or so samey that all the meals of all the weddings blend into one big blurry memory of tepid beef..... I only remember the food if its spectacularly bad or there isnt enough of it.
username123 wrote: » I dont think Ive ever eaten the cake! That is scandalous. They are basically charging 500 euro to cut and serve a cake to 100 guests.
sweetie wrote: » You must be going to the wrong venues. My sister recently got married and they had the reception in a hotel, 120 people fed and the fillet steak was cooked to order and was execellent. There are many fine hotel venues out there serving excellent food.
clint_silver wrote: » You see 500e, they see you asking them to serve your food when they run their business by making a profit on serving their own food.
username123 wrote: » The rest was either fine and simply not memorable, I was too drunk to notice, or it was awful in about 3 cases.
username123 wrote: » Theyre already making money off the wedding.
clint_silver wrote: » Any business, especially in the service industry, wouldnt last long if it adhered to the rule "we make some money, therefore we make enough money"
username123 wrote: » I dont pick the venues. In 40 odd weddings Ive attended I can remember really nice grub at 3 or 4 of them. The rest was either fine and simply not memorable, I was too drunk to notice, or it was awful in about 3 cases. I dont like fillet steak btw, so that would have counted as a "meh" meal for me.
sweetie wrote: » That was a recent example, I was told the seabass option that day was very good too. I've also had excellent pork, lamb and fish dishes at various recent weddings. I was mainly challenging your generalisation of all wedding hotels serving muck food which i havent come across in the last 10 or so weddings ive been to as a guest over maybe 3 years. As a dj I don''t often get fed but have sometimes had really excellent food at some of the functions i've done in recent times. There are of course some lower end venues still throwing out crap food like in any service industry but value and good quality aren't necessarily mutually exclusive.
Sleepy wrote: » username123, even if it's just making sure that the food is "fine" as opposed to barely warm ruberry chicken and over-cooked veg, I think it's fair to say it's important. You don't want your guests popping off to the chippy after paying a fortune to feed them...
therealgirl wrote: » if you decide to include wine I would buy screw top in the deals in Tesco/Dunnes & put a bottle on each table & leave the guests deal with it at their own table...I don't get 'corkage' fees...a bit silly I wouldn;t pay them to cut my cake either, that's silly also As far as your budget goes...it's your money, people come to celebrate you guys getting married, screw those who expect to come for the free dinner & drink!
Sleepy wrote: » Food wise, I think it's best to play safe when you're catering for 150 people. Go too fancy with your food and you'll find many of your guests won't eat it.