Serephucus wrote: » Right, can't figure this out. Seagate's new "Video" hard drives, how long is the warranty? They go out of their way to not specify it on their site.http://www.seagate.com/internal-hard-drives/consumer-electronics/video-3-5-hdd/
Headshot wrote: » Lads when will I beable to upgrade from 2 x 670s where I can see a noticeable difference?
BloodBath wrote: » Why would you even want to? I'd say at least 2 gens of cards anyway. I don't understand people who upgrade every gen of processor and card. You're all nuts.
Monotype wrote: » I'm half thinking of doing two Haswell itx builds now. One with the FT03 mini and no graphics card and a second as a mainstream.
Monotype wrote: » I reckon the warranties of most of their mainstream drives >1TB is two years. The video drives are mainstream - and not "high end" like the hybrid which have much longer warranties (5 years iirc). A few sites are listing them as 3 years. Only way to be sure really is to contact them or buy one and fill it into the site.
Taiwanese PC maker ASUS dropped this gem yesterday ahead of Computex 2013 -- the PQ321, a professional-grade 31.5-inch 4K monitor. It features a 3840 x 2160-pixel (16:9, 140 ppi) 10-bit RGB (one billion colors) IGZO panel with LED backlight, 176-degree viewing angles, 350 cd/m2 brightness and 8ms GTG response time. Beyond its Ultra HD capability, the monitor comes with built-in stereo speakers (2W) plus height, tilt and swivel adjustments. It's wall-mountable (VESA) and only 35mm thick -- according to ASUS, that makes it the thinnest 4K monitor on the market today. Connectivity includes DisplayPort, 3.5mm audio, RS-232C and, for US models, dual HDMI inputs with picture-in-picture support. There's no word on pricing yet, but the PQ321 will be available in North America at the end of June and ASUS is expected to show the monitor in Taipei next week along with a 39-inch 4K model.
beno619 wrote: » And the 4K Revolution begins ! (for the enthusiasts/crazies)
BloodBath wrote: » I assume that's the smallest 4k you can get. That's some crazy pixel density. I'd say it looks unreal. Good luck trying to run that res though. You would want a bare minimum of dual 680's. Even then you won't get 60fps at max settings.http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/Frame-Rating-High-End-GPUs-Benchmarked-4K-Resolutions
deejer wrote: » There is alot to be said for trying to pick up a GTX580 for Eur150 second hand now.
Tij da feen wrote: » I would consider picking one up if it wasn't such a power hungry thing. I really need to upgrade my GFX card this gen. I'm still running a 6870 and it's just not cutting it at 1080p right now.
NTMK wrote: » have you got an M-ATX board? what are you planing now given that there are like 10 pc cases in your sitting room (being honest its closer to an internet cafe than a sitting room at this statge )
Serephucus wrote: » And hey, if you happen to have a spare Z77E-ITX lying around...
Squaredude wrote: » Just put in a step up request to evga. If i get approved I get a 780 for €285.
Tea_Bag wrote: » any suggestions btw lads? gonna be paired with a 2500K or 3570K, gtx 690. asrock as usual? no real budget, so all suggestions welcome, but board needs to be able to accommodate (quad)SLI and a PCIeX1 sound card somewhere in between?. can it be done on mATX??
Tea_Bag wrote: » You'll be the first to know, but i dont think im selling it
Tea_Bag wrote: » no gonna need to buy one. any suggestions btw lads? gonna be paired with a 2500K or 3570K, gtx 690. asrock as usual? no real budget, so all suggestions welcome, but board needs to be able to accommodate (quad)SLI and a PCIeX1 sound card somewhere in between?. can it be done on mATX?? Ha im gonna try and fit another PC in here somewhere i guess I love doing lans/5 player co-op type games when youre all together with a few beers and stuff. its great craic isnt it?! having another pc is guaranteeing another butt on a chair.
Serephucus wrote: » We should have a Boards Chivalry night (I just discovered it yesturday. ****ing awesome game)
BloodBath wrote: » Can either of these do it? It seems like they should. Not cheap.http://www.hardwareversand.de/articledetail.jsp?adp=0&aid=57625&agid=1603&apop=1http://www.hardwareversand.de/articledetail.jsp?adp=0&aid=57518&agid=1603&apop=1
Serephucus wrote: » If you want the sound card, you'll have to use the 350D as a case. Because both those cards have to be double slot (PCI bracket connections) you can't get away with buying a single slot bracket for them when water cooled like you could with the 580, which means you'll have to use the very bottom PCIE slot for the second card, and on most boards I've looked at those are hardwired for x4 speeds. From looking at the manuals, none of the ASRock boards support anything more than x4 for the last slot. Edit: Nope, neither of those boards can. The Gigabyte one is wired for x8, but according to the site it drops to x4 if the other is populated. It is a bit unclear though, so I wouldn't rule that one as a definite no. Many thanks.
NTMK wrote: » I dont think quad sli and a soundcard is doable. its either sli or sound card as the gpus take up 2 slots. im going either with the ASus ROG board or the better of the asrock boards depending on their performance ill be using a DAC on mine but i doubt your willing to drop money on a good DAC i wasnt anyway ya lans are class its a shame we couldnt have organised proper one instead of it just randomly happening. it beats the lodge anyway:pac:
Tea_Bag wrote: » I might just have to wait a few weeks and see the mATX haswell boards? when are they due?
NTMK wrote: » we should really set up a PC B&U Steam group so we can stalk play games with each other
ShadowHearth wrote: » That would be class.
BloodBath wrote: » A 7950 would be a decent upgrade.
NTMK wrote: » I dont think quad sli and a soundcard is doable. its either sli or sound card as the gpus take up 2 slots. im going either with the ASus ROG board or the better of the asrock boards depending on their performance
NTMK wrote: » ill set it up if someone has got a name?
ShadowHearth wrote: » "Sexy nerds in tight pants"
game4it70 wrote: » Thats just wrong on so many levels :eek: