Seanafitz wrote: » This entire post disgusts me ... Shame on you OP .. Rape is not a topic for debate .. If a man has sex with a woman and she has expressed her opinion that she does not want to ? That's rape ... If a man has sex with a woman who is in such a bad state that she is unable to say yes or no .. The man is taking advantage so it's rape ... I agree with a post before this ... Rape is only not rape when it's not rape .. I'm actually sick that this thread has been allowed ... How can you question whether its rape or not??
TheLastMohican wrote: » Has the pendulum swung too far? Is dressing provocatively giving the wrong message?http://www.independent.ie/world-news/europe/nick-ross-triggers-outrage-with-comments-on-rape-29297621.html
NiallSparky wrote: » Yeah, absolutely. It's still 100% the fault of the perpetrator. It would be silly for a bank to put themselves in that situation though, just like it would be silly for a person to not take appropriate precautions against being raped.
NiallSparky wrote: » just like it would be silly for a person to not take appropriate precautions against being raped.
The Backwards Man wrote: » If I go into the bank tomorrow and there is a bag of money on the floor, I still know it is wrong to take it. Simple as.
TheLastMohican wrote: » Has the pendulum swung too far? Is dressing provocatively giving the wrong message?http://www.independent.ie/world-news/europe/nick-ross-triggers-outrage-with-comments-on-rape-29297621.html[/QUOTE] Sad thing is, you're probably not even trolling.