Wade in the Sea wrote: » As with History - check your facts - before casting an opinon
Wade in the Sea wrote: » First off - I am not anti Irish/Gaelic. Irish has a use, but better as a 3rd level Arts subject.
Insect Overlord wrote: » Irish is not just a subject. It's a language, a mode of communication and expression and record, one with its own long and ornate history that mirrors and intertwines with the subject (History) you're trying so desperately to defend.
Corkfeen wrote: » I actually only got as far as Junior Cert history, I am currently finishing my history undergrad though.:pac: I have found that many people in my course who had studied Leaving Cert history, struggled with adapting the way in which they analysed it. It tends to be one of the major complaints of history lecturers.
Wade in the Sea wrote: » A rather clever Spanish philospher in the 20th Century by the name of Santayana once said ""Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it". The Labour Party are proposing that History be made no longer compulsory for post primary students while the Gaelic Language spoken by a minority in this country remains at the core of Education? I smell a rat! Socialists are notorious for revisionism, but you wouldn't know unless you've studied history.... So what's more important - speaking a language that belongs in History or knowing that it once existed?
Jawgap wrote: » Finally, a lot of students demonstrate decent research abilities except they are - in a lot of instances - too lazy to go beyond Wikipedia! Once they get a good kick in the hole a prod they apply their abilities more constructively.