kylith wrote: » Where do you think it 'disappeared' to? The incident was recorded by Cogitosus, and reported on http://choiceireland.blogspot.ie/2008/02/happy-st-brigids-day-irelands-first.html In the middle ages abortion wasn't seen as a big deal at all, at least until the soul entered the foetus, i.e. when the baby started to kick. Even in the bible it's only punishable by a fine. Exodous 22-23
admiralofthefleet wrote: » an easy way to solve all this is to just outlaw the catholic 'religion' and seize its assets
RobertKK wrote: » Eamon Gilmore would love to do that.
Sarky wrote: » Always amusing how many Catholics know so little about Catholicism.
admiralofthefleet wrote: » so would i and the majority of the population im sure
admiralofthefleet wrote: » so they say nothing when scum like brady swears boys to secrecy yet are very quick out of the trap when it comes to them being upset animals
Call me Al wrote: » So is this special treatment recommended only for Irish TDs
ScumLord wrote: » Just like if I employed an engineer I'd want him to know what he's doing rather than thinking a prayer was an important part of his engineering process.
awec wrote: » It's also pretty hilarious that an organisation like the church is trying to take the moral high ground on this issue. Is Sean Brady allowed to take communion? They have "morals" when it suits.
kraggy wrote: » No mention on RTE about this as far as I can see.
Bishops ‘have not discussed’ barring politicians from communion over abortion stance
Nodin wrote: » Thats because....http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/bishops-have-not-discussed-barring-politicians-from-communion-over-abortion-stance-29240306.html
dixiefly wrote: » Has anyone a link to where the Catholic Church have said what is claimed in the OP?
WayneMolloy wrote: » Bill them for payouts the victims of clerical child abuse received - that will soften their cough. The church should realise its on thin ice and avoid political discourse.
kraggy wrote: » Am I right in assuming that the new legislation doesn't provide for somebody who has been raped and therefore she must have the baby unless she is suicidal?
greenpilot wrote: » Just heard this on RTE. Is this the last gasp of a dying church?
Nodin wrote: » Correct. Also the life of the mother has to be threatened, as distinct from the health. Fatal foetal abnormalities aren't covered either.http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/a-very-real-tragedy-behind-a-human-rights-case-230194.html
kraggy wrote: » I've just been reading the Guardian's article here http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/may/03/ireland-pro-choice-campaign-risk-prison While reading it, at times I was thinking to myself, what sort of barbaric country would imprison people forr 14 years for handing out information about abortions in Britain? And then I remember that I'm reading about my own country. Read the article in the link. It's ****ing ludicrous. Supposedly the women on the streets in Galway and Dublin who are handing out info this week could go to prison for up to 14 years merely for providing information. I didn't know this was the case. Is it a case that seeking information is allowed but providing it is not? And also, the issues of rape and incest are not being dealt with in this legislation. What the actual..? And furthermore, women who have been told that their foetuses are not going to make much more than minutes of life after birth are still going to be forced to go through with their pregnancies all the way through birth. For what? Who does that benefit? People reading about all of this in other countries must think we're the most backward shíthole on the entire planet. Lost for words.
jobeenfitz wrote: » Hope they die fast, they have really fukcd up the minds of too many people in this country especially any of us born in the 60's and before. Good riddance, Saint Patrick and all your snakes.
DEFTLEFTHAND wrote: » They aren't going anywhere imo, a worldwide religion with over 1 billion followers. I do hope that they reform, a new Vatican Council maybe to bring widespread meaningful change, It can happen but it will take a strong leader to do it. The problem in Rome is that the Curia tie up each conclave to ensure a new Pope doesn't ruffle any feathers, they're still seeding from John XXIII, nobody knew of his intentions when he was made Pope, they assumed he was a quiet old man who they could control