Ernest Oreo wrote: » I am confused about what is epic about this thread.
Mister Sifter wrote: » The size of the chip on the shoulder of the thread creator.
ajcurry123 wrote: » I requested the thread and my request was dealt with swiftly & courteously by the mod who in turn created it.
Aidric wrote: » Why exactly? The system worked well as it existed. If people don't post much in the thread it just means there isn't much interest in it. I personally find superthreads or 'epic' in this case to be annoying if they aren't used regularly. If i were to wish to review a previous tournament posts I will now have to sift through a 'epic' thread. Get me drift? Then again since Licksy left as moderator there seems to be a lot of change for change sake.
FixdePitchmark wrote: » storm in a tea cup. We would fight over a tea bag for the cup here. If feedback was still open. This idea could have been put up. Sure there was hardly anything on both tours last week. Now it is a panic. Good idea. IMO. And even if bad ,hope all will be more awake when there is NO thread up and Lowry leading in Euro Maxi Pad open of the Ring of Kerry.
ajcurry123 wrote: » My thinking behind it was to cater for the events that don't get threads set up for them. I do see the point around some bigger events would get lost in a thread and that is a fair point. From the reaction of some, you would swear that having 2 threads each week is a regular occurrence. The fact is that there isn't (this may be more pertinent for the Euro Tour) A slight over reaction by some re events running into events too I think, the Spanish Open has a 9 hole playoff on Sunday... talk had well stopped by this shortly after. I think there has only been one thread set up for the European tour this year (open to correction), that being the Spanish Open. Why don't I set one up each week? Because most of the time there's very little interest in the lead up to these events. That's not to say that something interesting or some talking points arise during them, and I thought it would be good to have somewhere to post if and when they do. I also think it would be a decent idea in terms of following certain players on the tour. A lot of talk among my golfing mates surrounds new players on the tour, their progress, future potential etc etc. I thought a thread like this may accommodate that interest. There's interest in the progress of players like Siem, Aguilar, the South Africans etc etc.... not just Lowry, PH and McIlroy (who have their own threads) Maybe it should be a general European tour (or PGA) discussion thread that caters for events that don't raise sufficient interest for someone to start a separate thread on them? I don't believe Greebo said that all event threads HAD to go into this thread. Believe it or not, he can be reasonable at times.
Aidric wrote: » Why exactly? The system worked well as it existed. If people don't post much in the thread it just means there isn't much interest in it.
Aidric wrote: » I personally find superthreads or 'epic' in this case to be annoying if they aren't used regularly. If i were to wish to review a previous tournament posts I will now have to sift through a 'epic' thread. Get me drift?
Aidric wrote: » Then again since Licksy left as moderator there seems to be a lot of change for change sake.
GreeBo wrote: » So a day in and people have already decided that its doomed to failure....yet it hasnt even had a chance to run yet. Perhaps giving it a few weeks and seeing what *actually* happens might be in order?
GreeBo wrote: » Why not exactly? Why not see how it works out rather than bash it before its even tried? 1) There wont be enough use of the threads. 2) There will be far too much overlap confused.com here. For me its far easier to search through a single thread for what you want than search for the thread for that tournament and then search within that thread? Why do you fear change so much?
Daithio12 wrote: » Nice one, you get feedback and you ridicule people, how very mature of you. Like the old saying goes if it ain't broke then don't try and fix it.
BigChap1759 wrote: » My understanding is that the statement from Greebo is in bold and so it's an order - maybe Greebo would be kind enough to confirm?