hfallada wrote: » What a fool to be recording the plant burning. A chemical plant like that would have extremely harsh chemicals which im sure a lot are known as cancer causing
Scotty # wrote: » 1+1=3. Well done.
roryc wrote: » I would be amazed if these aren't linked.
roryc wrote: » I hardly think its a big jump to say these are both connected. Waco is what led to the Oklahoma bombing. If this was just a coincidence it's the most unlikely one I've ever heard. Along with Oklahoma, Waco would probably be one of the top places that would be considered a target if you are looking at a terrorist similar to Timothy McVeigh for the Boston bombings, which seems a lot more likely at the moment than an international terrorist movement. And being the day before the 20th anniversary? I would be amazed if these aren't linked.
roryc wrote: » If this was just a coincidence it's the most unlikely one I've ever heard.
And being the day before the 20th anniversary? I would be amazed if these aren't linked.
opinion guy wrote: » I'd be amazed if they are. Staggering the amount of people jumping to conclusions.
EuskalHerria wrote: » A fire at a fertiliser factory causes an explosion. That's the most unlikely thing you've heard?
Jonny7 wrote: » jesus christ, a very bad week for the US bizarre coincidence too.. Waco siege ended almost to the day 10 years ago
donegal_road wrote: » this week is the anniversary week of Oklahoma bombing, Columbine massacre, Virginia Tech massacre, Waco and the Bay of Pigs invasion (Michael Moore Tweeted this today)
Alias G wrote: » I know, and such shoddy camera work as well. :rolleyes:
tbayers wrote: » Look at the video, slow it down at 0.28. Now is that not something HITTING the plant or just part of the explosion :O
AlanG wrote: » there is some speculation that the heat form the original fire may have triggered an explosion in a nearby silo containing grain or other materials. That is why the centre of the explosion is not in the fire.
roryc wrote: » No. An explosion, in Waco, a few days after the Boston bombing and a single day before the 20th anniversary. Read posts in more detail.
EuskalHerria wrote: » There was a fire at a fertiliser factory. The chemicals at the plant exploded. Look what the IRA did to Manchester wih using fertiliser as the main component of a bomb. That not suggesting there was any foul play here, I'm just saying that stuff is explosive, so any conspiracy theories even at this early stage are over the top. The reports are suggesting that Firefighters were at the scene fighting a fire and the fire must have spread to the chemicals causing the explosion. There's no connection to any other place or any other events. A tragic accident.
SantryRed wrote: » It's hardly a conspiracy theory when it hasn't been established as an accident? You're just as bad assuming it's an accident the way you're talking to him.
Scotty # wrote: » OMG!! Would you listen to yourself!! It's an industrial accident that started as a small fire that happened to spread to some hazardous material. It's a tragic ACCIDENT - nothing more. Happens every day of the week (fortunately not to this scale). Some tornado warnings now, suppose that'll be the work of terrorists too? or more far fetched - God maybe???
VinLieger wrote: » LOL what? Assuming a fire in an industrial plant is an accident is the same as assuming its a terrorist conspiracy linking 2 seemingly completely unrelated events?
Omackeral wrote: » Can I just say that this wasn't in Waco. Can people just stop and absorb that? It was in the town of West. Stop trying to connect them sensationally!! It's like a bomb going off in Liverpool and calling it an explosion in Manchester.