SparkySpitfire wrote: » I'm banging my head on the desk here. Either you're on another planet or you're deliberately reading what I'm saying wrong. If the school has no legal right to do what they're doing, someone who has a problem with it, should call them out on it. Then why isn't the phone call being made instead of you arguing about it?! I saw no problem, you did, now you're saying it's grand cos the problem can be solved with a phone call. What's to argue about then?! Seriously I don't get this at all!
MadsL wrote: » And as I keep saying the only harm caused is a bit of irritation and as it turns out a delay in getting a passport to say what name my daughter intends to use as an adult. I wasn't aware that being almost a bit cross and mostly irritated was such a terrible thing in Ireland. Shame on me.
Dan_Solo wrote: » That makes no difference really as to whether the school has a legal right to change pupil's names now does it?Because that'd be you using over-excitable hyperbole for a problem that will probably be solved with a 2 minute phone call?
fishy fishy wrote: » funny in all of this the OP won't actually say what the name is.....
SparkySpitfire wrote: » That's not what I'm saying at all. If people rail, (I didn't say whine, so don't put in quotation marks) on boards and everyone is getting up in arms about it, why don't they back up their arguments with actions? Simple as. Unless their arguments carry no weight to actually be able to follow through with action.
SparkySpitfire wrote: » It wouldn't be a problem for me because I never would have sent my son to a school that did that in the first place.
SparkySpitfire wrote: » But as I keep saying, if this issue is so important and going against human rights, why isn't a lawyer being hired?
SparkySpitfire wrote: » It wouldn't be a problem for me because I never would have sent my son to a school that did that in the first place. But as I keep saying, if this issue is so important and going against human rights, why isn't a lawyer being hired? Money can't be the reason as why should that stand in the way of people impinging your child's human rights.
Dan_Solo wrote: » That's a pretty thin line of argument there. If people "whine" on boards then the issue is guaranteed to be of earth shattering importance?:rolleyes:
fishy fishy wrote: » maybe you should have another read - it has now followed on from there
conorhal wrote: » Have you tried stamping your foot and slamming your bedroom door to get your way yet? Childish.
Dan_Solo wrote: » And if it's school policy to change people's names on their official documentation, is that OK too? What if they decided they didn't like your kid's name "Setanta" and decided to start calling him "William" instead? No problem right?
MadsL wrote: » I'm discussing the issue in a perfectly legitimate way, whilst you are drawing absurd analogies that have nothing to do with the issue. You seem to be the one lacking in common sense.
fishy fishy wrote: » dab - did you read the OP's first post My daughter attends a second-level gaelscoil that insists on calling her by a translation of her actual name that sound similar to her actual name but is in fact a different Irish name. maybe you should have another read - it has now followed on from there about middle and last names and wanting to now change a last name on a passport that is different to a birth cert but somehow the school addressing her in irish is the culprit. :D
HondaSami wrote: » These problems are encountered daily, it's not a new thing nor is it rocket science to clear up a very minor detail.
SparkySpitfire wrote: » If this issue is so illegal and abhorrent to you and the OP that it causes you distress to rail about it on boards
SparkySpitfire wrote: » The whole bureaucracy with the visa situation on this matter is entirely ridiculous. I still stand by my last post but the OP shouldn't have to go to the expense of paying a commissioner of oaths to get his child a visa for the US because he chose to give her the best education he could and the paperwork didn't add up! Madness!
Cavehill Red wrote: » You don't actually have a universal right to wear your own clothes. In practice, you regularly commit to a contract to wear clothes decided by others, be it a work uniform, hospital clothing or formal dress at a fancy ball with a dress code. You do, however, have a universal right to be addressed by your own name.
HondaSami wrote: » It's not the same thing at all, if you go to a Gaelscoil you speak Irish and only Irish, you learn everything through Irish. Am i correct in saying they are calling her by her Irish name? they have not changed her name, it's the same name but in Irish.
fishy fishy wrote: » it doesn't - it sounds like when you are doing your education through Irish in Ireland, and specifically pick this choice, then your can't stomp your foot when you are addressed in Irish.
conorhal wrote: » It seems basic common sense is in short supply these days unfortunately, I suspect if the OP were to join a golf club he'd be baffled and shouthing unfair! if they objected to him using a cricket bat to knock his ball around the course. He's having ah hypersensitive baseless whinge, and you have to wonder, what does that teach his daughter other then parents can act like a whinging self entitled teenager too?
fishy fishy wrote: » coulnt' have put it better myself.
fishy fishy wrote: » yourself.
Dan_Solo wrote: » You are not being addressed at all as that is not your name.
MadsL wrote: » She needs to show common usage for two years to change a passport name. Her school has changed her name to a new (Irish) First Name and Surname She wants to use her Birth First Name and (Irish) Surname. Passport will not be changed until she leaves school + 2 years.
MadsL wrote: » She would prefer to change it in future to her Irish surname. Not her makey up "Irish" first name. In total there would be four versions of her name that are on official documents if that happens.
true wrote: » Let it be a warning to parents not to send their children to Gaelscoil. If the school behaves like this, how else are they trying to indoctrinate the child?
SparkySpitfire wrote: » It's school policy in places to wear a uniform. I have a right to wear my own clothes. They breaking the law here too?
ballsymchugh wrote: » yes, it would be. it happened to a member of my family. a commissioner of oaths is what you need in that situation.
Wiggles88 wrote: » Not for the American banks I'm afraid.