thefishone wrote: » Multi room is not a problem,they simply replace whatever box you want and setup the wireless whatever way you want. They don't and have no need to touch the setup in the rest of your house
coylemj wrote: » Did they offer to replace the main box and a multiroom unit with the new technology? If they did, did you take up the offer of master & slave boxes? If not you, do you know if any testers have a pair of new boxes talking to one another?
zg3409 wrote: » From what I understand UPC do not currently supply a horizon compatable multiroom box. However tablets, PCs and other DNLA compatable devices http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Living_Network_Alliance may just work out of the box as multiroom devices. It would be better if these devices were connected using computer cabling rather than assuming the wireless will be reliable enough for streaming live TV and other uses. Old multiroom UPC boxes will not be able to use any of the horizon features.
iDann wrote: » What happened to the original remote design?
belmulletman wrote: » Are you saying that if someone was to have a Horizon box and it was configured to their network, all they need is a device that can see DNLA to view content off the Horizon box? Surely that won't work for live channels?
zg3409 wrote: » Yes thats how it works. The horizon box has 4 or 5 tuners meaning different devices in the home can each watch different channels, either live or recorded. The system is designed to be better than Sky, but still has it's issues.
JoeyJJ wrote: » Do you know belmulletman? Couldn't find it going back 5 or so pages and you seemed to ask simular question on this page. I'll buy you a pint in O'D's some day Although your interest in this box looks like you don't live down there any more.
JoeyJJ wrote: » Sound, I guess someone will figure it out at some stage. I prob won't be selected on trial so prob a long way off. I wouldn't be down that way too frequent I married belmulletgirl (not a real boards username)
Not Telling My Name wrote: » I have the Horizon service on test but we are not allowed to talk about it yet, was the only thing we had to agree with to get it.
flanna wrote: » Does anyone know if the testers are charged install/activation fee's as well as the monthly cost?
thefishone wrote: » Was this from the initial email or was it said to you over the phone?
Not Telling My Name wrote: » It's the way we got it, anyone I know has it either works for UPC or knows someone who does in a management capacity. I don't work for UPC and the someone I know told me that was the condition I would get it on.
thefishone wrote: » Mmmmmm, cause I told them I would be discussing the box on boards and had no problem.
iDann wrote: » Why do they want it confidential? We know so much about it already, what's there to hide! They're not Apple at all
Not Telling My Name wrote: » I'm guessing for 2 reasons... 1) There's inevitably problems with any launch of a new product so they don't want people online saying "this thing is fecking crap, it's not working" type stuff. 2) They'll have an influx of calls from people wanting it.
Mr.S wrote: » Realistically unless you signed a NDA you can do what you want! Perhaps don't use your firstname.lastname as a username though!
Mr.S wrote: » Just got an email saying I was accepted onto the Horizon trial! wohooo