Mod Post: A reminder to folks that trying to bait supporters by posting alternate names for a football club may lead to a yellow card. Folk are welcome to post in any superthread they wish to, but nobody is free to use superthreads or this forum in general as somewhere to try and bait/flame/troll other posters.
BhoscaCapall wrote: » He is making a salary from his position is he not? And surely after recent turmoil you want someone there for the long term who wants the club to actually do well for the right reasons? Even Murray had Rangers' best interests closer to heart than Green does, and look where that got you. Even there it could be argued that in spite of it leading to the club's demise it still brought you success (untainted in your eyes I expect). Green could well lead you to the same end but without any (proper) trophies.
"Over the last few years this coaching staff has won the SPL, a few cups, a European trophy, another title this season......"
Coillte_Bhoy wrote: » Ally's latest Anyone care to enlighten me? I seemed to have missed this one.....
PauloMN wrote: » What do you make of this folks?
blahfckingblah wrote: » Whats the story with charlie green thinking hes alan sugar on the apprentice?
PS: So you told Rangers fans Man Utd were supportive of Rangers moving to the English Premiership. Manchester United say they are opposed to it. CG: So Sir Alex Ferguson wouldn’t like to see Rangers in his league? Who is Manchester United? You define Manchester United.
Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: » To be fair I had not seen the statement when I posted previously on the site it says got to a European final
Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: » You mean sacking people that's his job as CEO surely or shouldn't he do that
blahfckingblah wrote: » Did i say that? Its just that hes sacking people every turn around no need to be like that about it mate
Dempsey wrote: » He's sacking everyone at every turn because of the ridiculous contracts offered last summer in the face of a £7m hole in their balance sheet. I bet its his bonus that he's trying to protect and is prepared to destabilize the management of the first team to protect himself.
Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: » You must have inside information good stuff. You have no idea whereas we as the fans can at least see what's happening week in week out. All you have is an opinion that to be honest isn't up to much after all according to you we were getting stripped of titles a trophies oops
Dempsey wrote: » hearing on twitter from all corners that charlie green was blown out of the water over his takeover lies on sportstonight. anyone have a link?
Dempsey wrote: » Look at yer financial statements :rolleyes: Did Nimmo ever explain or try to quantify how he came to the conclusion that Rangers did break the rules as everyone knew ye did but somehow didnt get an unfair advantage that nobody else had? One of life's mysteries i suppose like Sevco's financial statements apparently... :rolleyes:
Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: » But but you kept telling me we were loosing our titles because it was already in the bag. Talk about a u turn. lol Though this club you talk of does not exist
Dempsey wrote: » Thats not a u turn! Your club was found guilty of cheating. Why Nimmo decided ye shouldnt lose titles over cheating is something that hasnt been explained properly to anyone. Also, contrary to the belief of some in this thread, Rangers tax case isnt over. Just to clarify again Rangers still exists, they are in the process of being liquidated Sevco 5088/Scotland is the Charles Green cash cow I make that distinction in my posts because they are two different things in the eyes of Scottish Law and in Rangers fans eyes when it suits them.
Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: » Wrong again he stated clearly that all players had been registered properly it was merely an admin problem but hey ho Again the holding company is the Rangers PLC You will continue to call us what you want so that's me finished
"Although the payments in this case were not themselves irregular and were not in breach of SPL or SFA Rules, the scale and extent of the proven contraventions of the disclosure rules require a substantial penalty to be imposed. "Rangers FC did not gain any unfair competitive advantage from the contraventions of the SPL rules in failing to make proper disclosure of the side-letter arrangements, nor did the non-disclosure have the effect that any of the registered players were ineligible to play, and for this and other reasons no sporting sanction or penalty should be imposed upon Rangers FC."
Dempsey wrote: » That some nice waffle there. What he actually said was That assessment flies in the face of the rules and he didnt explain how he arrived at the decision that you didnt gain any unfair competitive advantage. You can act the idiot all you like though EDIT Also other clubs have gotten penalties much heavier than fines for what Nimmo has described. Again I make the distinction because the the real Rangers company that has been in existance for the past 100+ years still exists despite a name change and Sevco is still the new company that Charles Green has convinced ye to buy into despite a name change
Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: » I think what you will find is what of the old Rangers company entered liquidation in October 2012. As for Sevco no company of that name is attached to Rangers but then you have been told this more than once but you have been told this many times before. AS for Lord Nimmo when he was appointed all I read from you on here was how great it was that we were losing our titles we didn't its over so stop greeting like a big wean be a man for gods sake and accept you lost your argument you can waffle about what was said all day long the only thing that counts was the decision that neither the SPL or SFA appealed. I wonder why
