bren2002 wrote: » An interesting article here. Thread cautiously.http://www.newstatesman.com/economics/2013/03/bitcoin-what-bubble-looks
Amberman wrote: » Let me add some flesh to the bones of your analysis. In a free market what drives price in anything with relatively fixed supply, is demand. Nothing else. Could some or all of that demand come from a spec bubble? Ofcouse. Has it in this instance? I really dont think so. Let me explain. I'd imagine its a mix of trend following speculation and a flight to safety...heavily weighted towards flight to safety. Look at three things. 1. How many 10% and 20% drops have been mitigated by fresh buying during this run? What does that tell you? 2. Various Bitcoin apps in the iPhone marketplace soared from nowhere to top 50 or 100 in ONE day in Italy and Spain last week. To me, that strongly indicates that people en masse were trying to flee Euros in weak peripheral countries. 3. Shocking revelations from Eurocrats at all deposits are now fair game. This price move looks unlikely to have been spawned by a handful of speculators.http://blockchain.info/charts/my-wallet-n-users?timespan=1year&showDataPoints=false&daysAverageString=1&show_header=true&scale=0&address= The chart above shows that Bitcoin wallets have grown around 50 fold since April 2012 on blockchain.info
Jonny7 wrote: » I presume you're putting every penny you own into Bitcoins.. or are you holding back for some reason
brendan86 wrote: » its what i wanna do but i wont buy at $90 i wanna have money in mtgox and if it ever goes down to 70 i would like to purchase then... I wont purchase at $90 but i seen last night it was at a high of $95 then few hours later $75 then went back up to $90... I know its a risk but if I deposit to mtgox can I wait and leave my money there for weeks until I see the right price I wanna buy at? And its safe without purchasing?
Tearwave wrote: » Has anything as explosive (as BTC has been in the last 6 weeks), in the history of investing ever maintained such levels without crashing? I'm asking sincerely as I'm not actually an investor and have quite limited knowledge, my interest in BTC is more technology-related.
bren2002 wrote: » I don't know if anyone can answer that. If there's a huge crash, how exposed are mt gox? If they become insolvent, you're screwed. These aren't regulated like stockbrokers for example.
pH wrote: » As an "historical" aside - on May 21st 2010 a $25 pizza was bought for 10,000 BTC - if laslo had hung onto those coins - as of today he'd have $930,000
milltown wrote: » I kind of know how he feels. When I started looking into Bitcoins last December they were just over €9. Every time I check back to see what the current rate is I ask myself why I didn't just pile a couple of hundred Euro into it as a gamble? €500 in December would have covered the family holiday to Orlando this year at today's rate.
Amberman wrote: » With Canada, NZ and Australia now openly telling depositors that they will be bailed in, I can only see this type of demand increasing.
Roonbox wrote: » Can you tell me where you heard this? That's major news.
martyoo wrote: » Looks like Instawallet got hacked.
georgiecasey wrote: » while Cavehill_Red has a sketchy technical understanding of bitcoin at best, I agree with him that it's a massive bubble at the moment. it's gone from $100 yesterday to $115 now! i bought some a few days so i could use it to actually buy something, you know, like you normally use a currency. everyone i talked to just bought it to hoard it and wait for the price to go up. a classic bubble. but when the crash comes, i'm interested to see what happens after. i've been obsessed since i bought my service from a legit website and it worked! (and it wasn't anything illegal before you ask!) it's just the coolest thing ever, the technical details are really interesting. new yorker just came out with a great article about it:http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/elements/2013/04/the-future-of-bitcoin.html
Amberman wrote: » If you measure it compared to the value of deposits in Cyprus over 100k, (which seems the likely reason for the rise in value) then it still has a very long way to go to catch up the the diluted value of those deposits.
Amberman wrote: » I cannot see how you can mathematically demonstrate that it has soared above its fundamentals and is now a bubble...because it has none.