Chucken wrote: » Oh I'm not making out we're better than this generation. I was trying point out thats its all happened before...no doubt it'll happen again. One thing though, I certainly never held out for a "certain" type of job, I took what was there. I had 2 children to raise and if I got a few hours here and there, it didnt matter what it was. All the hours added up and I made it through without signing on. My oddest job was chimney cleaning, I bought some brushes and knocked on doors! Big deal you might say? No big deal only I'm a woman
SEPT 23 1989 wrote: » I wish this country had more Vincent Brownes
Three Seasons wrote: » Can you clarify what "this generation" is?
the emperors innuendo wrote: » I was once a great believer that one should respect his elders but I no longer believe in this considering how my parents behaved during the economic boom, remortgaging our family home and now we are faced with the prospect of losing it. I think its time for a social revolution in this country where the youth should mobilize and the old should step aside so that we can restore it to its former glory. Because it has been at times of great crisis where the youth have shown true leadership!
LETHAL LADY wrote: » So their poor financial decisions are the tip of the iceberg?
the emperors innuendo wrote: » I was watching Vincent brown the other night and among the panel he had on was a young female candidate for some by election. I think she said she was 27 or so. Although I am a fan of Brown and the controversy he generates, being the presenter that he is he had to ask that stupid question posed to all young aspiring politicians which is; 'do you not think your a bit young?'. I cringed when asked this question. what has age to do with political competence? The track record of the past government would suggest that old age corresponds with political incompetence. Off the top of my head I would think that the medium age of those in that government was 50. Going by Browne's logic and probably the logic of many of the elders in this country, would suggest the older a party is the more politically competent it is. But this is obvious bullcr.ap as history has thought us that with age in this country comes political incompetence since it is now the generation of youth, my generation, who has to clean up after the shower of crooks and gangsters who took a world class economy and drove it into the ground. Perhaps its my generation who are better off running this country since it is us who have paid the ultimate price by the incompetence of our elders since we are the ones who are first hit by social welfare cuts and forced to immigrate because of the lack of opportunities our 'elders' deprived us of. I was once a great believer that one should respect his elders but I no longer believe in this considering how my parents behaved during the economic boom, remortgaging our family home and now we are faced with the prospect of losing it. I think its time for a social revolution in this country where the youth should mobilize and the old should step aside so that we can restore it to its former glory. Because it has been at times of great crisis where the youth have shown true leadership!
periodictable wrote: » I don't object to her age. Rather I have a problem with nepotism. We need a law that prohibits any family member from running for a relative's seat. They should instead have to seek election in another constituency.
Galwayguy35 wrote: » It was your parents generation that worked their way out of the recession of the 1980s which is the one I grew up in. Your generation has achieved nothing yet so until you do talk is cheap.
i would rather watch them suffer the effects of their own greed.
the emperors innuendo wrote: » I was watching Vincent brown the other night and among the panel he had on was a young female candidate for some by election. I think she said she was 27 or so. Although I am a fan of Brown and the controversy he generates, being the presenter that he is he had to ask that stupid question posed to all young aspiring politicians which is; 'do you not think your a bit young?'. I cringed when asked this question. what has age to do with political competence?
CollardGreens wrote: » You would rather watch them suffer? Then should they have watched YOU suffer when you needed: To have your messy bottom wiped when you were a baby and they just should have left you in your own poop? To have you go to school with no shoes (no, they are not free) Needed food, cooked and birthday cakes on your birthdays? A bed to sleep in Supplies for school Of course the list could go on and probably still does. Someone should paddle your messy behind until it knocks some reality into your ungrateful self centered spoiled rotten mind! It's NOT all about you or your generation, we are have crosses to bare ~ I'm sure your parents gave up a lot for you, and this attitude is what you give them back? That YOU WANT THEM TO SUFFER???? You are not worthy, shame on you! :mad:
This is what parents do. And that is the bare minimum. No parent should ever expect thanks for taking care of the child THEY decided to bring into the world. If there are people out there who think their children should grovel to them because they bought school shoes or wiped their bottom, they're not fit to be parents.
PhlegmyMoses wrote: » What a load of nonsense. That generation did the exact same as this one, just replace Britain with Australia and the US with Canada.
the emperors innuendo wrote: » first hit by social welfare cuts and forced to immigrate because of the lack of opportunities our 'elders' deprived us of.
Galwayguy35 wrote: » It's your parents home seeing as they paid for it not you, sure you grew up there but you have no claim on it as it wasn't you paying the mortgage. To be honest you sound like a typical celtic tiger cub who had it good during the boom years and things are different now. It was your parents generation that worked their way out of the recession of the 1980s which is the one I grew up in. Your generation has achieved nothing yet so until you do talk is cheap.
the emperors innuendo wrote: » i would rather watch them suffer the effects of their own greed.
CollardGreens wrote: » NO, this is not what all parents do, what I typed is what GOOD parents do, parents that LOVE their children. And children should be grateful for even the bare minimum and respect/thank their parents. Children are a gift from God, and if that child gets born to good parents, then it is also the child that is gifted too. I just read an article about a mother that had her 5yo shot for the insurance money! Some mothers sell their children, read another story yesterday about parents that kept their small child in a cage. A lot of young adults today are of the entitlement generation and they EXPECT just because they were birthed into this world that the world and their parents OWE them......this is a fantasy, it doesn't work that way anymore than it worked that way with all the other generations. Life is not easy no matter what your age is, people do the best they can and don't need to be given any s**t because they can't live up to impossible expectations.
the emperors innuendo wrote: » I'm 26, my parents are 59 and 55.
Galwayguy35 wrote: » Where did I say people didn't leave in the 1980s for work? The point I was making was that that generation had it just as tough and they worked their way out of it.
Arpa wrote: » Entitled to something? What has your generation achieved, and what part did you play in it? You did nothing...stop trying to feel important by claiming you were of the generation that ended a recession. You had no control over the sway of the economy...that was determined by fiscal policy over which you had no control. Like it or not you're just another pawn spending your pay cheque in Lidl every week.
Ray Palmer wrote: » You claim to have been independently living since 17. You could have well been but all the things you had at the starting point were from your parents. Unusual to have parents cut off their children at this point but if you say they never gave you anything are you being truthful?