Stheno wrote: » Lolol didn't get the job in the end, got offered a new role in my current place, looking forward to it, but it's a fairly massive challenge. If I'm not around here much for the next few weeks, it's due to the appalling hours I'll be putting in Expecting to be doing 7:30 - 21:30 M-T less on Friday with about ten hours over the weekend :eek:
Ardennes1944 wrote: » nothings worth that unless its only a short stint. you need sufficient downtime!
Matt Simis wrote: » Legally she can only work hours like that for a number of weeks, then it needs to average out per quarter to something more normal. Cant remember the exact figures, but generally employers wont allow long term application of such work week hours.
draffodx wrote: » Are you bananas!?
RoverJames wrote: » Indeed, not good for either mental or physical health. A relative ended up quite unwell due to similar hours. F that imo. But if it rocks your boat, well done.
RoverJames wrote: » They will, wrongly so of course but it goes on wholesale.
RoverJames wrote: » ..... Part time gig so :pac:
RoverJames wrote: » Can't be a licensed premises or security, otherwise its ok I believe.
Stheno wrote: » Yeah legally it's no more than 48 hours per week on a quarterly basis, but it's not enforced.
pred racer wrote: » Guys, that was a european directive that Ireland never signed up for. Or at least that was the way it was explained to me las time I worked in Ireland. I know the last place I worken In Ireland went out of its way to say it was volentarily (sp?) implementing it (except where business needs applied ) but it didnt have to Its defo a big deal over here in France, but they wouldnt work to warm themselves anyway:p On a different note, I'm heading out to Paddy O'Niells in Chailly en Biere for a few well deserved paddy's day pints. Anyone fancy one? I'm buying:D
Stheno wrote: » Nah we have the working time act which implemented the EU directive. Enjoy your pints
Matt Simis wrote: » Think you guys are confusing who is being protected by enforcement, its the employer not you. Not enforced = easy and profitable lawsuit against them later in the year..
Ardennes1944 wrote: » A memory just came into my head that id forgotten. Last June in Normandy with my brother it was about half 8 and the sun was setting.We were tootling along in our rental Corsa along the coast road from Colleville-sur-Mer to Port en Bessin and were overtaken by a Bumble-Bee Camaro. The noise off it, the sunset over Omaha Beach with Pointe Du Hoc in the background and the general area we were in made it one of the best memories I've ever had Oh how we tried to keep up but 1.3cdti doesnt match it for pace
Ardennes1944 wrote: » A memory.............
Limerick man wrote: » Banned for using 1.3 cdti and pace in the same Sentence.
RoverJames wrote: » Was that yourself I saw in Douglas Dunnes today?
RoverJames wrote: » Was about 12 Was coming out of the non food section and thought it was you pretending to work in the fruit and veg area, wasn't 100% sure tbh.