ZeitgeistGlee wrote: » The number of Irish people who have no level of English at all with which to communicate is functionally nil I imagine.
Coles wrote: » English shouldn't be taught in school. It's a complete waste of resources that we just can't afford in these tough times. Everyone already knows the language anyway. Or they can learn it on the telly, innit?
Iwasfrozen wrote: » You'd have a point if the English language was taught in schools post primary.
Coles wrote: » You're in for a big shock when you go to secondary school.
Iwasfrozen wrote: » So from that I would assume you are in favour of scrapping the commissioner? A man whose sole purpose is to impose his view of the language on other people.
Coles wrote: » "It woz learnin Irish wat made me tick, innit." That's quite a popular claim made by really stupid people. They think that if they didn't have to learn Irish then they would have excelled at their other subjects. Seriously, they think that. Some even claim that they hated Irish so much that they stopped going to school altogether. And where does their hatred come from? That's an interesting question and I'm not sure if it has a simple answer, but usually they they have been brought up in a household where the parents have had limited education and the children are not expected to put in much effort either. And the same attitude will be passed on to the next generation too..."Ders Sumfink betta on da telly, innit."
PopePalpatine wrote: » I'd guess that those who claim that "learning Irish made them stupider" probably mean something along the lines of, "I could have used that time to study another subject or improve whatever other subjects I have".
Coles wrote: » And where does their hatred come from? That's an interesting question and I'm not sure if it has a simple answer, but usually they they have been brought up in a household where the parents have had limited education and the children are not expected to put in much effort either. And the same attitude will be passed on to the next generation too...
Coles wrote: » "It woz learnin Irish wat made me tick, innit."
That's quite a popular claim made by really stupid people. They think that if they didn't have to learn Irish then they would have excelled at their other subjects. Seriously, they think that. Some even claim that they hated Irish so much that they stopped going to school altogether.
And where does their hatred come from? That's an interesting question and I'm not sure if it has a simple answer, but usually they they have been brought up in a household where the parents have had limited education and the children are not expected to put in much effort either. And the same attitude will be passed on to the next generation too...
Coles wrote: » And if a Garda has gone through 14 years of learning Irish in school and still can't speak the language then I think it's fair to say he's probably a bit too thick for the job. 14 years and he still couldn't speak the language?! WTF?
Mick ah wrote: » I have a passionate hatred for people wasting my time. I felt learning Irish as a waste of my time. I felt this from a very young age. Did I get this from my parents who always encouraged me to work hard in school and pushed me to do the best I could academically so that I would eventually bash out a decent leaving and attend the top college in the country? Attend it to do engineering, where, guess what, maffs and all are used innit, not irish. I won't begrudge people for wanting to learn Irish. In fact I feel that if it wasn't shoved down everyone's throats there'd be more good will towards the language. I feel that making it optional wouldn't just improve the standard of the language among those who are learning it in school, but would eventually have more people wanting to learn it. And the case for the language isn't helped when despite a lot of people saying it's "our" language, it really isn't. Most people cannot speak it, their parents cannot speak it, neither their grandparents and so on. So how could it be their language unless they make the effort to go and learn it, willingly. It's also not helped by native speakers and their high horses. I have a friend who is studying to be a primary school teacher. Every year they have to go to the gaeltacht. There they're just "dubs learning Irish." It's sad that that is how the locals feel, because without dubs learning Irish there'd be a considerable fall in revenue for their local economy.
Coles wrote: » "It woz learnin Irish wat made me tick, innit." That's quite a popular claim made by really stupid people. They think that if they didn't have to learn Irish then they would have excelled at their other subjects. Seriously, they think that. Some even claim that they hated Irish so much that they stopped going to school altogether.
bb1234567 wrote: » And plus irish is a very easy language to learn for speakers of most languages in europe. I speak irish fluently and when learning it I found it to be much easier to learn than german. The irish grammar is so straight forward. If we had any way half decent irish teachers at primary and secondary schools maybe irish would be spoken more widely and be given a better chance at survival.
Coles wrote: » it IS their own culture
krudler wrote: » Irony being native speakers look down on people learning the language as adults as well
Coles wrote: » "It woz learnin Irish wat made me tick, innit." That's quite a popular claim made by really stupid people.
Coles wrote: » It's great to see all the hatred coming out about the language. Really gets to the nub of the problem. ATTITUDE. An inferiority complex about their own culture. And it IS their own culture, despite the vehement attempts to deny it!
And what of the French? We learn their language, and we love it. We have a good ATTITUDE towards their culture and we love their country. But imagine France without French! Impossible, isn't it? It's the very glue that bonds them. It ties them to their history, their ancestors, their land. But 200 years ago almost nobody spoke the language.
To create a strong, proud, progressive and indivisible France, where difference is not just tolerated, but celebrated.
Not a nasty mean little country where people are ashamed of their culture. Where they don't just sneer at those who are proud of their past, but actually deny that their past even existed.
Coles wrote: » And what of the French? We learn their language, and we love it. We have a good ATTITUDE towards their culture and we love their country. But imagine France without French! Impossible, isn't it? It's the very glue that bonds them. It ties them to their history, their ancestors, their land. But 200 years ago almost nobody spoke the language. It was revived in order to tie the disparate sections of their Nation together. To create a strong, proud, progressive and indivisible France, where difference is not just tolerated, but celebrated. Not a nasty mean little country where people are ashamed of their culture. Where they don't just sneer at those who are proud of their past, but actually deny that their past even existed.
Wibbs wrote: » 200 years ago almost no one spoke French? I'd suggest you do some reading up on history. What were they speaking in France, Greek? There were different dialects alright and there were minority languages like Basque and Breton and there was a drive to standardise the language, but that's a tad different to "almost nobody spoke the [French] language" in France. I've read dafter notions, but rarely enough.
You do realise that that's a little bit of a contradiction don't you? If difference was tolerated then surely the dialects wouldn't have mattered.
clairefontaine wrote: » I think it makes sense to have it as an option in school but no sense to have it as an official language that costs the state millions in duplicate copies of everything. The country cannot afford these kinds of vanity projects.
LordSutch wrote: » We (the Irish people) have allowed Irish to die out over the last two hundred+ years.