Madam_X wrote: » Oh the naivety of the "Some women look better without make-up" line. Keep telling yourselves that. And yeh sure, you'd consider spots, blemishes, broken capillaries, dark circles, pastiness SO much more attractive than that skin with just a light spreading of a skin-matching foundation that merely evens things out. Your open-mindedness, I'm not convinced by - or else you don't fully understand how properly applied, minimalist make-up works. What do you mean by make-up? Eye make-up unquestionably makes nice eyes look even nicer. It doesn't take long to put it on with practice either. Lipstick doesn't suit every woman for sure, foundation should only be skin-matching and light - none of that heavy chocolate/orange muck, garish eyeshadows look clownish. But all the right stuff simply makes women look better - and saying it doesn't just reeks of thinking you know about a subject, which you haven't an iota about. I'm sure some women look as good without make-up, but "better"? Kidding yourselves. Better with less make-up maybe. And in the case of natural beauties, make-up just makes them look even more stunning.
OldNotWIse wrote: » Did you go out with a drag queen?? lol only joking. I think its a cliche about women spending hours on makeup. I spend an hour all in getting ready for a night out and that includes shower/hair and probable glass of wine One thing that I do find silly is women who constantly touch up their makeup when they are out, going off to the bathroom every half hour to put on more lippy (that will just get left on the pint glass anyway lol)
Madam_X wrote: » Oh the naivety of the "Some women look better without make-up" line..
sbsquarepants wrote: » An ex of mine used to take at least an hour before she would leave the house, double sometimes treble that if we we're going somewhere nice - it was ridiculous. I've only gone for ones who don't wear makeup, or at least wear it rarely ever since! Lifes just too short to wait around like that again.:)
starlings wrote: » I take your point about covering blemishes, but it makes me sad to see teenage girls and young women in make-up, when - unless they have spots from hormones, and not all of them do - their skin is the softest and peachiest it will ever be.
MugMugs wrote: » So if you're due out for 19:30 tell her 18:30. That's what I've always done and it's always worked.
sbsquarepants wrote: » An ex of mine used to take at least an hour before she would leave the house, double sometimes treble that if we we're going somewhere nice - it was ridiculous. I've only gone for ones who don't wear makeup, or at least wear it rarely ever since! Lifes just too short to wait around like that again.:) You are aware that people can have different tastes? I very much prefer my girfriend without makeup, she'd wear it on the odd ocassion like weddings and so on - but makeup only ever looks like makeup, no matter how much you kid yourself about it looking natural!
bluewolf wrote: » Mine takes 10 mins to apply, max.
bluewolf wrote: » Mine takes 10 mins to apply, max. You just got unlucky picking someone taking hours, if they genuinely did Good eyeliner does improve anything!
Madam_X wrote: » People drink coffee because they like the taste and the sensation it gives when you're tired/hungover. Not because it's cool in America. FFS. Why can't some people accept that just because they don't like something, doesn't mean others are "pretending" to like it?
Madam_X wrote: » Oh the naivety of the "Some women look better without make-up" line. Keep telling yourselves that.
Madam_X wrote: » Not if it's so well applied as to look natural. I don't actually wear foundation - I'm lucky I've clear skin. And I don't wear lipstick or colourful eyeshadow. But I wear eye make-up, and it definitely makes me look better. Takes minutes to apply - not insecurity, just liking looking my best.
starlings wrote: » but that is in the eye of the beholder, no? not Mrs Mirror Mirror on the Wall.
Fair enough you feel you look better with your make-up routine, but if others hold the (unpopular) opinion that you don't, or "women" don't, you won't convince them.
Madam_X wrote: » There's a difference between "Women look better without make-up" as if it's an objective fact and "I think my partner looks better without make-up."But yeh, I'm sure some people genuinely hold the opinion that a woman with a muffin-top and wearing hot pants and a tank top looks "better" than the same woman wearing a flattering outfit.
Madam_X wrote: » There's a difference between "Women look better without make-up" as if it's an objective fact and "I think my partner looks better without make-up." But yeh, I'm sure some people genuinely hold the opinion that a woman with a muffin-top and wearing hot pants and a tank top looks "better" than the same woman wearing a flattering outfit.
starlings wrote: » see now I hold the opinion that I'm back in the girls' toilets at school, and the pretty princesses are going to shriek with laughter as soon as l leave the room with my bare freckledy face and unmanageable hair.
Madam_X wrote: » But that's not what I'm saying at all. Merely saying make-up usually makes a woman look better doesn't automatically mean she's a fecking state without it; it just makes her look better. I've no issue whatsoever with people thinking I look pasty and plain when I've no make-up on. I certainly wasn't one of the pretty princesses when I was a kid btw.
Czarcasm wrote: » Yes but now you're of an age where you can do something about your freckledy face and unmanageable hair? I mean, children can be cruel (and even some adults never got past the cruel child stage), but just as most children mature into adults, so too should people who were teased as children back then. I'm not the same child who went to school with the àrse missing out of my trousers showing off my paisley underpants and my uniform shirt missing half the buttons. I can laugh at it now but back then, Jesus! :pac: There's a Maury "geek to chic" show in there somewhere! :pac:
starlings wrote: » There is nothing wrong with my freckledy face, nor my curly hair that is still sometimes difficult to keep tidy. There never was anything wrong with them, but thanks for the sympathy and positive encouragement.
What I was getting at is that when the girls would bang on and on about make-up and insist I use it to cover my freckles, or try to fix my hair into a style I didn't want, I would politely decline, hoping they would leave me alone and not laugh behind my back,
while silently developing my Unpopular Opinion that they were quite an unimaginative bunch of twáts.
Czarcasm wrote: » I'm sorry starlings, I'm not best known for my complimentary nature, just ask my wife! Yes her bum DOES look big in certain dresses, but I LIKE a big bum! It's just not the answer she wants to hear I prefer when people talk behind my back tbh, if they can't say it to my face it's not worth listening to and even less worth getting stressed about. Bit of reverse snobbery there though starlings in fairness.
starlings wrote: » It's kind of reverse snobbery, but not exactly, because I still baffle some women who really like make-up and hair-styling, and they seem to almost feel sorry for me. Like I think you did, a bit :pac: and then it gets a bit lady-doth-protest-too-much, when all I'd like is not to be judged on my looks alone, or for anyone to judge my looks at all. (To my face anyway; like you I don't care otherwise.) But I stand by thinking the arbiters of grooming are unimaginative, since some people, even some men on this thread, do like a more natural look.
starlings wrote: » There is nothing wrong with my freckledy face, nor my curly hair that is still sometimes difficult to keep tidy. There never was anything wrong with them
all I'd like is not to be judged on my looks alone, or for anyone to judge my looks at all. (To my face anyway; like you I don't care otherwise.)
But I stand by thinking the arbiters of grooming are unimaginative, since some people, even some men on this thread, do like a more natural look.