Strawberry Milkshake wrote: » Why are the Guards getting a bashing on here? FFS they arrested 5 people who were more than likely armed, not long after the incident. Well done Gardai. Credit where credits due.
SoulandForm wrote: » In all seriousness is there any proper evidence as opposed to hearsay such as convictions of people in the 32 csm for drug offenses that the RIRA are involved in the drugs trade- I know about the volunteer of theirs who they killed for growing some cannibis plants but besides that?
fasttalkerchat wrote: » Just heard that its alleged he was a tout. He walked away from some heavy charges a while ago and something didn't add up.
Nodin wrote: » Well its unlikely to have been over what to order. The shower lifted are linked with the Ryan faction, who have clashed with the rest of them before. Secondly, its a classic bit of defamation to allege somebody is a tout when they've been killed.
.jacksparrow. wrote: » You're source the herald by any chance?
Nodin wrote: » Cork Examiner....http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/five-men-arrested-after-ex-real-ira-leader-shot-by-rival-group-224710.html
.jacksparrow. wrote: » So why would Ryan gang target him for not coughing up money,if their meant to be guilty of this?its all bs,how the cork examiner or the herald would know half of what's going on is a mystery.
celt 22 wrote: » There is a lot of rubbish being spoken on here about the victim being a scumbag or a thug when nobody actually knows the man or can name one thing he was convicted of. A google search of his name yesterday told me only that he had donated a defibrillator to his local running club yet the same search today informs me that he was some kind of monster. What a load of crap, every journalist who googled his name yesterday read that same story yet I didn't see it in any of the newspapers. It's easy to call someone a thug or a scumbag when they are dead. If he was such a scumbag how come we haven't been reading about him in the rags over the last few years? Where are all his criminal convictions?
Zebra3 wrote: » Seems like they weren't too bothered about doing their job.
SoulandForm wrote: » they showed how drug crimes and addictions were considerably lower in Nat/Rep as opposed to Loyalist/Unionist areas according to official statistics
gallag wrote: » You wouldn't have a link to these official stats?
Bambi wrote: » Because those terrorism charges are sooo hard to make stick in this country?
SB2013 wrote: » Well when the Supreme Court ruled a ton of Offences Against the State search warrants as unconstitutional a lot of terrorism convictions were overturned.
laoch na mona wrote: » and rightly so
SoulandForm wrote: » During the Troubles people accused the Provos of being involved with drugs but only one member of the Provo movement during that time was arrested for drug crimes and that involved cannibis for personal use. Awhile back I had a debate with someone about punishment beatings/shootings (I was opposing them) and they showed how drug crimes and addictions were considerably lower in Nat/Rep as opposed to Loyalist/Unionist areas according to official statistics and how this was probably down to Anti-GFA armed Republicans. A lot of support and sympathy from the armed groups comes from the fact that they deal with anti-social activities.
frfintanstack wrote: » Thinly veiled post supporting shooting people in the kneecaps in kangaroo courts....:rolleyes: