The Last Bandit wrote: » Can't seem to shake off the kiddy image the Wii/WiiU have/has. Doubt I'll ever buy either. Probably get a PS4 6-12 months after launch or the first price drop which ever is sooner. Given both consoles will be very similar I doubt I'll bother with an Xbox till much later in its life unless its got some super awesome must have exclusives (I don't count Halo). Of course all this could change depending the launch prices, ability to play used games, etc etc etc.
o1s1n wrote: » You could say the snes and the nes have kiddy images - and look at all the great games they have! I wouldnt let that stop you
The Last Bandit wrote: » Not really, any of the Wii titles I'm looked at are all stupid fat headed avatar yokes Maybe it's cus its what my nieces and nephews play Not having a go at Nintendo, just have little interest in the Wii. Maybe I'm missing out but sure I've already have more 'must play' games than I'll ever get around to playing !!
krudler wrote: » I'm never an early adopter of new consoles, its usually at least a year before something that's a system seller appears going on the last gen of consoles, Nintendo not releasing a Mario or Zelda game day one is criminal, not since the n64 days and Mario 64 was a day one killer app. last console I bought on launch was the gamecube, that had a decent launch lineup and stuff like Resident Evil not too long after it.
o1s1n wrote: » Just think, with every extra generation that comes along, it means an even bigger (and cheaper!) backlog of older games to get through. There's an absolute tonne of 360 games I haven't played yet which I'm sure I'll be playing well into the next gen. As long as my console holds out that is!
deathrider wrote: » I'm really in no rush for a new gen. On the other hand, though, I'm looking forward to seeing all the current gen games crash in price so that I can pick up a bunch of them.
Retr0gamer wrote: » I'm in no rush for the New gen either. You see everyone complaining that there's no games for the WiiU or Vita and how it was so terrible the 3DS had so few games in it's first year. Well the thig is those consoles aren't as awesome as the Dreamcast or Neo Geo Pocket so they followed the trend of every other console launch of having **** all on them in the first year.
unky chop chop wrote: » I spread my gaming evenly between new gen and retro. You're a fool if you slate gaming advances through your rose tinted glasses, as are you if abuse retro gaming through your Google glasses.
unky chop chop wrote: » To dismiss playing current gen games because there is too many retro games to play is absurd.
o1s1n wrote: » It comes down to a cost thing with myself. Why pay €600 for a new PS3 on release and €60-€70 for games when they'll be a fraction of the price a few years later? I just don't like to throw money away. I like getting value for it. Having something which is 'cutting edge' and 'new' means nothing to me.
Andrew76 wrote: » I'll take that Oculus Rift off your hands when it arrives so.