RoverJames wrote: » Nah, they wouldn't suffer increased wear, they just move about a tiny bit.
advertsfox wrote: » Great stuff, thanks! Is it possible they are more worn due to the possible lack of lubrication?..................
RoverJames wrote: » I doubt that squeak is the wear indicator, more likely the back of the pads are lacking some coppor grease. They may or may not be worn, impossible to tell without looking at them or the discs.
CianRyan wrote: » It's a diesel, right? 2.4 IIRC? Lovely car alright. I was toying with the idea of a 1990-1994 Spider instead of the MX5 during the weekend, from what I've read and seen though, they're much rarer, much more expensive and not as nice to drive. As beautiful as they are, I think I'm sticking. Applied for two jobs this week already, lets hope I get an interview at least!
Alanstrainor wrote: » Noice. What's under the bonnet?
Gary ITR wrote: » With the way things are you need to be applying for 200 jobs a week dude, what kind of work are you looking for?
CianRyan wrote: » Applied for two jobs this week already, lets hope I get an interview at least!
166man wrote: » Yeah feck, sorry folks I thought dropbox was the best way to go? Imgur you say?
MugMugs wrote: » If their your photos and you're logged in then you'll be able to see them. If they're private though we won't. I can't anyway and I even went to all the trouble of checking on the pc
166man wrote: » what? I can see them perfectly, not sure what I'v done wrong tbh..
RoverJames wrote: » .... No doubt on your desktop :pac:
OSI wrote: » Need to make them public dude.
Gary ITR wrote: » Is the car sluggish after about 4k RPM?