junder wrote: » No alliance party mla's elected where I live, and Naomi only got east Belfast because iris couldn't keep her knickers on. Alliance party voters normally hail from cultra and would be middle class soft unionists
junder wrote: » She got elected as a protest against Robinson, she won't get elected again
SoulandForm wrote: » Im sure they get more votes than the PUP get though. Naomi got elected because of her hard work and her genuine love of the people. As much as I strongly disagree with her about a lot she is good person.
SoulandForm wrote: » Oh catch yourself- you look at the votes cast where and who gets elected and who doesnt. You know well its the truth.
junder wrote: » Evidence?
junder wrote: » The only person I see expressing and facist sentiments is yourself, so what would you do to this community you dispise so much, if you had the chance
SoulandForm wrote: » At the end of the day more working class Protestants and those from a Protestant background vote for the Alliance than they do for the PUP.
junder wrote: » Alot of working class Protestants class themselves as loyalist
SoulandForm wrote: » Did you hear Naomi Long speak about "gate keepers" who claim to speak for Working class Unionist communities? Well I would remove the gatekeepers and the godfathers from their positions of power. These communities have some genuine and some over the top fears of the other side, as the other side has of them. I would try to deal constructively with that. An attack on Loyalism does not equal an attack on the unionist/Protestant working class. You only need to look at the rejection of PUP at the ballot box to see that.
SoulandForm wrote: » Its not a matter mate of not liking them, I absolutely hate them. That doesnt go for many people in or who vote for the DUP necessarily . The DUP is a lot more active than the UUP and on economic issues is a lot more left wing. There are a lot of reasons that people who are Protestant or from a Protestant background would vote for the DUP over the UUP.
SoulandForm wrote: » Its not a matter mate of not liking them, I absolutely hate them.
gallag wrote: » Soulandform, I am starting to think you dont like the loyalists????
GRMA wrote: » A far as loyalists go Irvine was better than most but that is not saying much. I think if he hadn't have died he could have redeemed himself further
Crooked Jack wrote: » Check out the guy on the left. Frazer's right hand man, you could say
Chuck Stone wrote: » Here you go.
SoulandForm wrote: » Nah maybe they were both unrepentant bloodthirsty degenerates just one was in the pocket of the UK state and the other was is own man which is why they colluded with his killing/murder in the highest security prison in western Europe?
Chuck Stone wrote: » I don't think the two men's names should be in the same sentence unless they're being used for contrast. One was an unrepentant bloodthirsty degenerate and the other was a former paramilitary turned peacemaker.
SoulandForm wrote: » Would David Irvine or Billy Wright they were alive be welcome?
junder wrote: » Is that the David ervine who had members of the British and Irish governments attend his funeral, the same David ervine who had Gerry Adams and other members of Sinn Fein at his funeral as well, whose wife is promoting Irish within the unionist community?
SoulandForm wrote: » Because they suspect that he is still anti-Zionist? Would David Irvine or Billy Wright they were alive be welcome? Those men were a good deal more hate filled and murderously so than Nick Griffin. The correct comparison between Loyalists on the mainland would not be with the BNP but with Combat 18.
junder wrote: » Bnp has no involvement in the protests where I live and they would not be welcome to either