barrackali wrote: » The above nonsense won't happen, it was all madness to think they could avoid the charge....isn't going to work out well for them. They seem to think "Don't Register"...well hello...they don't need 2...the revenue will have all the details they need to charge them. The Revenue now have access to their ESB/SKY/UPC and other utility company details, all those providers will be obliged to hand over the relevant information. The best thing is....they will have it deducted directly from their salaries if they refuse to pay up.
Bullseye1 wrote: » So you believe we haven't been suffering the worst financial markets since the great depression or that 175,000 people have lost their jobs in the construction industry.
donalg1 wrote: » Where exactly did I say that? I believe I said something along the lines of I will be taking claims of civil unrest and protests with a pinch of salt. Dont know how you missed it seeing as you quoted me in your response.
statements by auctioneering organisations that they will be discounting farmhouse by “at least” 50pc, writes Darragh McCullough
spikethedog wrote: » We might see civil unrest when the troika's new croke park deal is put through. Maybe when the public service workers have to face the reality everyone in the private sector had to face, they might take to the streets.
Am Chile wrote: » I see this reported on the Facebook page of the Farming Independent ... following on what Michael Healy Rae has been saying in the media over the past week or so. But seemingly auctioneering organisations have made statements suggesting they intend to write down the value of farmhouses for property tax by "at least 50%". http://www.facebook.com/TheFarmingIndependent/posts/466932653363312
donalg1 wrote: » No I dont Ghandee do you? This again Ghandee, alot of conspiracy theories here today, I would imagine if the Govt were to introduce a new tax on tin foil ownership you guys would rush away from this thread and start an actual protest somewhere.;) But obviously you know who "they" are :rolleyes: and have some evidence to back up your claims. I only want to know who around here wants to pay extra taxes?
Ghandee wrote: » As Pippa's arse said, I want to leave occupations out of it.
In saying that, you're a staunch supporter of the cpa and all connected to it though. Right?
donalg1 wrote: » Wrong.
Ghandee wrote: » Lol... I'll let followers of this thread make up their own minds so.http://www.boards.ie/search/submit/?user=448937&date_to=&date_from=&query=%2A%3A%2A&forum=1196
donalg1 wrote: » Laugh all you want Ghandee but I would love to see you provide some evidence to back up your claims that I am a staunch supporter of the CPA and all connected to it. Providing a list of my posts doesnt really cut it tbh. I wouldnt think you would find me saying in any of them that I support the CPA.
Ghandee wrote: » I I think the posts relating specifically to the CPA thread are more than enough to hang you out to dry Donal. You keep denying it though, if you want to wait until I'm home from work and on my laptop I'll really unearth some 'evidence'.
spikethedog wrote: » It's obvious that the one's promoting a property tax are the ones who stand to benefit from it. There would be no other reason to so staunchly support it. Either public servants or working for companies with a vested interest, i.e. government contracts. I'll dismiss any argument about broadening the tax base, blah blah blah..... it's the same thing. Nobody could have so many posts on one internet thread and not have a vested interest in what they're promoting.
donalg1 wrote: » Who are the "ones" you refer to, like I said earlier I don't think anyone here is promoting it. Why would anyone want to pay more tax?
spikethedog wrote: » Because they agree with and don't want to break any laws, ever?
Vladimir Kurtains wrote: » Spain and Portugal both have a longstanding property tax. Greece got one last year.
donalg1 wrote: » Not wanting to break a law doesn't mean you want to pay more taxes, it means you don't want to break a law the clue is in the phrase. Again I don't remember seeing anyone here promoting the hhc either.
Ghandee wrote: » Andrew Doyle on the VB show last night... When challenged as to how the latest budget had any kind of negative affect on him, based on his take home pay of €100k+ per annum.... 'er.... Well there's the property Tax, obviously Vincent, then there's er... Em.... That is, you see... (looks up to the heaven's begging God to help him out) ah, student thing.....' Even tried to play down his salary! VB had to remind him that it was 92k PLUS expenses. They aren't living in the real world. Enda will not be impressed, botched his lines/forgot his script.
Le_Dieux wrote: » Saw that Ghandee - what an aishhole! He screwed it proper, Vinny licked the floor with Him - GOOD! Also heard the lip Phil on Morning Ireland this morning. Where does he get this 70% compliance from? 70% = 1,330,000 households which paid, according to him. What a bull****tér!
Vladimir Kurtains wrote: » Someone asked the question. I answered.
donalg1 wrote: » I have been reading the same stuff on here since last year. People talking about a tipping point, mass civil unrest, riots in the streets, burning buildings and more. And all this was supposed to have been coming in 2012, so if I am now reading that it is on its way this year I will take it with a pinch of salt.
flutered wrote: » there is a long road to travel before they have each and every householder by the short and curleys, me, i have no notion of paying it, i am fighting cancer at the moment, so the revenue can oool their heels, btw when i pass away can i not by word of mouth say who is to get my gaff, they then do as i have done, not seek title to it.
spikethedog wrote: » See my post earlier, number 4486.
Le_Dieux wrote: » If that's the case, why do You bother Donal? Fúck me, if a person moans about reading something over and over, why don't they just píss off? How bloody hard is that?
