SoulandForm wrote: » Given that he is from an Ulster Protestant background, hardly sympathetic to militant Republicanism and that this is appearing in a mainstream British newspaper I hope that those who have expressed veiled sympathy for the protesters or criticized the Alliance Party for reaching the compromise it did with Nationalism and Republicanism will pay attention to what he has to say.http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/these-belfast-riots-arent-over-the-flag--but-the-creation-of-a-fairer-society-8444651.html
junder wrote: » So because he's a Protestant from Northern Ireland that automatically makes him an authority on the subject. Why doesn't he come down to the area I live in and speak to the employed women behind the protest, these women that are not on drugs or any other stereotypical social problem journalists like to attribute to my community.
SoulandForm wrote: » Who is helping through her activity to deny other people the chance of having meaningful employment and dragging the place's reputation further through the dirt. You know her, why is she doing it junder?
junder wrote: » Because she is fed up with the continued and systematic assault on the British identity, not only are her symbols, but her culture is being denied, she is not even allowed the dignity of defining her own cultural and national identity without idiots dictating to her that she is Irish because they say so
SoulandForm wrote: » British culture is in no way being denied. There is no looming ban on following Manchester United, reading Shakespeare or eating fish and chips.
Tea drinker wrote: » I do not agree. surely all nations can fly their flag over gov buildings all the time. Perhaps we should lower the irish flag over Gov buildings here, in fact pretty apt given how solidly we have been defeated in Europe.
junder wrote: » Because she is fed up with the continued and systematic assault on the British identity not only are her symbols, but her culture is being denied
she is not even allowed the dignity of defining her own cultural and national identity without idiots dictating to her that she is Irish because they say so
Chuck Stone wrote: » And here's the problem right here folks. Not being allowed to dominate the north with symbols and unrestricted marching of 'the Queen's highways' is considered an assault on 'British identity'. Well if moves towards parity and equality in the north is viewed as an assault on 'British identity' then you're not being very British. Unlike the British you speak of in the north the British (in Britian), on the whole, consider themselves a tolerant bunch who respect the democratic progress. Is her identity so fragile that she feels threatened by the opinions of people she's never met that have no bearing on how she lives her day-to-day life? Poor pet.
junder wrote: » Poor pet indeed, still, she's the one blocking the roads up here along with many like her.
karma_ wrote: » It's a shame that it took the taking down of a single flag to provoke her into action when she and many others like her could have protested years ago about the absolutely abhorrent state school system that young protestants have to endure up here. And that's just one example. How long have the DUP been failing working class protestant communities now? Yet still voters ignore actual issues and vote for them in election after election. The fact is this was a non-issue from the get go and the DUP have used this girl for political gain whilst failing her at the same time. If it wasn't so utterly pathetic it would be funny.
junder wrote: » DUP are not behind this, Infact they are ****ting themselves that the list control, deride the all you want but these protests are coming from the people not political party's, some personalitys are trying to hijack things for its own ends, but they will fail. Post all you want on the Internet pour as much scorn as you like on the people taking part but it won't change anything and its not going to stop them.
sure joe wrote: » can you imagine how ridiculous it is for unionist to riot because the union flag is only being flown for the same number of days as the rest of the u.k. if unionist are struggling with this concept. then imagine living under this flag when it is the one represnting a people and country that has oppressed your people for hundreds of years. imagine living in your own country the country of your forefathers and having this oppressors flag shoved down your throat at every turn.
sure joe wrote: » as i see it flag comes down republicans 1 - 0 unionists unionists attack their own police force republicans 2 -0 unionists just waiting for police to attack unionist riotes like they would repulicans. then we have a hatrick
woodoo wrote: » I don't really agree with the point scoring. I want to see real equality in northern Ireland. I don't have a problem with your average unionist. I do have a problem with loyalist bigoted thugs though.
Defiler Of The Coffin wrote: » I fail to see how bringing the flying of the flag over a civic building into line with the rest of the UK is an attack on the PUL people's culture. It's certainly no excuse to grind entire cities to a standstill like what happened to Belfast tonight. It really seems to me that those protesting are simply unhappy that the days of the northern orange state are well and truly over and 'the other side' now get a say in how the place is administered. You may see that as me 'pouring scorn' on the people taking part but really I can't see any good reason to cause so much trouble over something so trivial. For feck sake it's a flag!
sure joe wrote: » but to them its not just a flag it was a symbol of their control. something to let the irish know who was the boss. this is why they are making such a big deal because their power is eroding
Defiler Of The Coffin wrote: » Surely that's a cynical way of looking at things, but in the absence of any better explanation it's not an unreasonable viewpoint
sure joe wrote: » who are the idiots dictating that she is irish becase they say so. if she was born and bred in ireland then that is what dictates she is irish. if a person is born and bred in england and have irish ancestors. they might like to think they are irish but the fact of the matter is that they are english
sure joe wrote: » if a person is born and bred in england and have irish ancestors. they might like to think they are irish but the fact of the matter is that they are english