junder wrote: » Poor pet indeed, still, she's the one blocking the roads up here along with many like her.
Chuck Stone wrote: » And here's the problem right here folks. Not being allowed to dominate the north with symbols and unrestricted marching of 'the Queen's highways' is considered an assault on 'British identity'. Well if moves towards parity and equality in the north is viewed as an assault on 'British identity' then you're not being very British. Unlike the British you speak of in the north the British (in Britian), on the whole, consider themselves a tolerant bunch who respect the democratic progress. Is her identity so fragile that she feels threatened by the opinions of people she's never met that have no bearing on how she lives her day-to-day life? Poor pet.
junder wrote: » Because she is fed up with the continued and systematic assault on the British identity not only are her symbols, but her culture is being denied
she is not even allowed the dignity of defining her own cultural and national identity without idiots dictating to her that she is Irish because they say so
Tea drinker wrote: » I do not agree. surely all nations can fly their flag over gov buildings all the time. Perhaps we should lower the irish flag over Gov buildings here, in fact pretty apt given how solidly we have been defeated in Europe.
SoulandForm wrote: » British culture is in no way being denied. There is no looming ban on following Manchester United, reading Shakespeare or eating fish and chips.
junder wrote: » Because she is fed up with the continued and systematic assault on the British identity, not only are her symbols, but her culture is being denied, she is not even allowed the dignity of defining her own cultural and national identity without idiots dictating to her that she is Irish because they say so
SoulandForm wrote: » Who is helping through her activity to deny other people the chance of having meaningful employment and dragging the place's reputation further through the dirt. You know her, why is she doing it junder?
junder wrote: » So because he's a Protestant from Northern Ireland that automatically makes him an authority on the subject. Why doesn't he come down to the area I live in and speak to the employed women behind the protest, these women that are not on drugs or any other stereotypical social problem journalists like to attribute to my community.
SoulandForm wrote: » Given that he is from an Ulster Protestant background, hardly sympathetic to militant Republicanism and that this is appearing in a mainstream British newspaper I hope that those who have expressed veiled sympathy for the protesters or criticized the Alliance Party for reaching the compromise it did with Nationalism and Republicanism will pay attention to what he has to say.http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/these-belfast-riots-arent-over-the-flag--but-the-creation-of-a-fairer-society-8444651.html