RobFowl wrote: » Lads/Lasses lets get back to the important issues.... Will i tape the interview or watch it live (not going to pretend I'm going to avoid it). And much more importantly is it one for Leffe, Hoogardeen, duval, Red wine or else go native and have a Boston pale, Brooklyn lager or sell my soul and watch it with a Bud.....
buffalo wrote: » It's 2am Irish time, right? Perfect if I can't sleep tonight! \o/
Glass Prison 1214 wrote: » Do you know if it will it be on tv or will I have to stream it?
T-K-O wrote: » :rolleyes: ill informed? He was a cheat and he abused his power, what am I missing. I've said this on numerous occasions. If someone doesn't like an opinion they usually revert to the good old troll comment. I didn't answer the last question because I clearly stated my point of view, no point rising to a loaded question like that. You have a narrow minded view on drugs in sport, it almost sounds personal. The hate for Lance is strong and that IMO prevents you from having an adult conversation on the matter.
RobFowl wrote: » Don't watch it on an illegal stream, Oprah and discovery channell won't be able to make lots of money from the interview then.....
Armstrong will address the alleged doping scandal, years of accusations of cheating, and charges of lying about the use of performance-enhancing drugs throughout his storied cycling career. The special 90-minute episode of Oprah's Next Chapter will air Thursday, January 17, from 9 to 10:30 p.m. ET/PT on OWN: The Oprah Winfrey Network. In addition, the interview will be simultaneously streamed LIVE worldwide on Oprah.com. ... he U.S. Anti-Doping Agency released an extensive report accusing the renowned cyclist of doping throughout his career.
mcgratheoin wrote: » Holy Crap - just read this bit of it... "A truth that went overlooked in the debate over those samples is that in at least two samples, 100 percent of the protein isoforms in Armstrong’s electrophoresis gels were consistent with synthetic EPO. That means that he had taken so much EPO for long enough that his body basically shut down its own production; it didn’t even register on the test."
Fr D Maugire wrote: » How do I have narrow minded view on drugs on sport exactly? I take a dim view on an individual who would actively use a illness that affects millions of people around the world as part of his strategic plan to cheat his way to victory. That sets him apart from all other dopers. You have singularly failed to explain or clarify your point and clearly I am not the only person who feels that way. Maybe someone else can try to clarify your point for you. You offer nothing in the way of examples or comparisons to flesh out your theory whatever it may be. When asked what your big picture idea you refuse to answer. You don't even try to discredit any examples I give. Then you claim I cannot debate like an adult. Really, well in a debate people usually put forward their facts and figures to back up their opinion but you refuse to do that. Why is Lance being treated unfairly?? In comparison to who and please don't say 'other athletes'. What other athletes? His contemporaries Ullrich? Basso? Valverde? Virenque? who.
T-K-O wrote: » Obviously I agree. This post is common sense. We all know what the guy did, no need for another history lesson. However to completely dismiss the possibly that he raised the profile of the sport etc, is ridiculous and /or to accuse people of defending him for stating such a view, well Im at a loss
LeftBlank wrote: » It's not on until next week...
happytramp wrote: » Anyone have a link for the 60min with travis tygart last night? Can't find it anywhere.
Cienciano wrote: » Came on to post the exact same thing. It might take a few more days to appear somewhere
G2ECE wrote: » The problem I have with that is he did it under a false pretense and then went on to destroy the careers of some of those that questioned him while using Livestrong and Cancer awareness as his rationale. Hark back to the Tour of California press conference with Kimmage, that is a bully of epic proportions at work, one very nasty person. He did that in public, can you imagine what he was like behind closed doors???
buffalo wrote: » ah balls. Thanks for the heads-up!
alfalad wrote: » Think the interview has been aired but can't find out on any news sites if he has confessed!:mad:
