mango salsa wrote: » I quite like it
StinkyMunkey wrote: » Bring back the death penalty....!
john47832 wrote: » For the kpmg girl?
StinkyMunkey wrote: » It wouldnt be the death penalty id give her, but i would play hide the sausage with her:D.
StinkyMunkey wrote: » Well im guessing she was of the legal age considering she was a little tipsy, and in what looked like a fast food place. Then again who knows, this is Ireland after all. Guess id just have to ID her first.
john47832 wrote: » I thought it was the certain days that it was being flown
DEFTLEFTHAND wrote: » KPMG girl was obviously very drunk and young. Hopefully this event will stand to her. She needs shift her pseudo elitist attitude, a KPMG partner my ass! That's being comfortable not wealthy. I hope Dad funds her college or whatever and she gets on ok.
Czarcasm wrote: » Ahh John, come on now! Carrie was a freelance journalist who spent the ten years of the show writing about her lack of understanding of the opposite sex, and when she wasn't trying to latch on to gay men, she spent ten years chasing a man she called "Big", who showed little interest in her, only when it suited him? Based on that premise alone I'd say she was more than just a bit dim, and as for the others, while professionally they may have been portrayed as capable, their personal lives were completely unrealistic, especially the swinging sexpot character that was Samantha!
mango salsa wrote: » For someone who hated it so much you sure did watch it a lot
Czarcasm wrote: » Perhaps I'm showing a little bitterness at the fact my wife religiously watched this show for the ten years or so it was on, then the constant re-runs on comedy central, and just when you thought the nightmare was over, they squeeze the last out of the franchise by bringing out not one, but TWO god awful films, and are now in talks about a THIRD one!!
Czarcasm wrote: » My wife watched it, I just happened to be in the room at the same time!
Nodin wrote: » Apparently the early seasons were quite good, however it supposedly "jumped the shark" later on, and was more noted for who was wearing what than wit.
stoneill wrote: » Despite the recent tragic events, this type of fundraising is only there so some people can have free holidays paid for by everyone else.
Madam_X wrote: » From what I know, there is still a lot of expense for the climbers. Not sure scaling a mountain is a holiday either (in the "respite" sense of the word).
Larkin00 wrote: » Its in there genes to steal and be a general nuisance. I'm in 6th year at the moment
1ZRed wrote: » How's the auld biology study going for ya, bud?
Larkin00 wrote: » Not bad. We recently learned about how characteristics like being able to spot a nice reel of copper wire can be passed from generation to generation.
Czarcasm wrote: » Never mind biology, I hope they're not taking Honours English for their Leaving Certificate!
Larkin00 wrote: » I think travelers are bad people by nature. Its in there genes to steal and be a general nuisance. I'm in 6th year at the moment, in my whole 6 years any traveler who has came to my school has left after there Junior Cert and were just complete trouble the whole time they were there. I've never met a decent one. I worked in a barbers last year which was in a area full of travelers and I saw it on a daily basis. They would come in, a group of say 5, one would come up talking to me asking prices or something another would be talking to the bloke cutting hair and the others would be mooching about looking for things to rob. The bloke who owned this barber shop was considering opening a second shop in a gym near a well known halting site and was discouraged by the owner of the gym because of the trouble he himself was having with them. These are just a few of my own experiences and I'm sure i'll get the usual "there's bad people everywhere regardless", there is bad people in all ethnic groups but not to the extent of the travelers. There reputation isn't unfair its completely justified.
