padd b1975 wrote: » http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2001/mar/25/ameliahill.theobserver
Senna wrote: » People are judged by all their actions, not just if they were nice to speak to. Both your neighbours were scumbags that probably ruined dozens, if not hundreds, of lifes.
orestes wrote: » Ronnie wasn't gay, he was bisexual, he was in a serious relationship with a woman for about 3 years before he was imprisoned. Even if Ronnie did have sex with guys who were under the age of consent that actually wouldn't make him a pedophile, pedophile means pre-pubescent. Shagging teenage guys is not the same thing as shagging boys. I've never heard or read anywhere about Reggie being suspected of being gay, if true it's pretty interesting. Where did you read that?
Seedy Arling wrote: » He was a massive philanthropist alright. He donated shed loads of cocaine to America. :pac:
Biggins wrote: » Part fear/part notoriety. Just look at O.J. Simpson and others of even smaller questionable nature. Some people love to mix in that company. It massages their ego sometimes.
orestes wrote: » Pablo Escobar - one of the biggest criminals in history, a billionaire, a massive philanthropist, and even at one point a politician. He built hospitals, churches and loads of sports stadiums/facilities. The people of Colombia loved him.
dd972 wrote: » anyone fancy forming a boxing club for some local kudos the criminals / gangster fraternity have utter contempt for the average joe soap
padd b1975 wrote: » Ronnie Kray was a raging homosexual, it was an open secret that he used rent boys on a regular basis, it was generally accepted that some of these boys were under age which would make Ronnie a paedophile. Reggie was also suspected of being gay.
Jumboman wrote: » Can anyone tell me why the The Krays are so popular in London ? I just dont understand how people can look up to these Scumbags.The way people talk about them you would swear they ran some sort of Charity :rolleyes:
orestes wrote: » Ronnie was bisexual, not a pedophile.
padd b1975 wrote: » Only if you messed with the kids Ronnie messed with.
DEFTLEFTHAND wrote: » John Bindon was another London gangster who was highly regarded, he ingratiated himself into the aristocracy, he even got invited to holiday with Princess Anne's party in Mustique, he claimed to have had sex with her on the trip. He also had a brief spell working for Led Zeppelin's security until he pulled a gun on a roadie one night. In 1979 he walked for a murder in a highly controversial trial where some argued his celebrity status influenced the jury's decision.
Pottler wrote: » Not Ronnie, he had issues tbf, I've often heard it said, not that I'd have a first hand genuine clue really. I'd have waay more time for the Richardsons tbh, they were really just very very tough businessmen as opposed to outright gangsters as they are always portrayed.
Pottler wrote: » Not Ronnie, he had issues tbf, I've often heard it said, not that I'd have a first hand genuine clue really.
Seedy Arling wrote: » Can't really see any articles. Just see a lot of blog stuff. Could be the tin foil hat brigade at it.
orestes wrote: » If you messed with women or children they would destroy you.
Jumboman wrote: » Can anyone tell me why the The Krays are so popular in London ? I just dont understand how people can look up to these Scumbags. The way people talk about them you would swear they ran some sort of Charity :rolleyes:
Pottler wrote: » I'm not Seedy, usually I'd debate or mock anything. This is just somthing I'd have a view of my own on and wouldn't really care what anyone else thought of that, it would not change my view one bit, tbh.
Seedy Arling wrote: » You're sort of missing the point of discussion forums there then horse.
orestes wrote: » Anything is possible, if it were true as it would cast the way people view them in a very different light. Can you post any links to articles?
orestes wrote: » Not a chance in hell, they would have been more likely to kill child molesters than help them.
Pottler wrote: » Probably true, to you. They were not scumbags to me, they were businessmen who happened to be in illegal businesses. I'm not going to defend them, I'm just giving my honest view. I'm also not getting into keyboard warriorship, but I never heard anyone call them a scumbag, ever, I suppose you just grow up with different views of people. I was just giving my perspective anyway, not looking for a row or a debate really.
Seedy Arling wrote: » I just googled it. There seems to be a lot of speculation out there about it.